» Articles » PMID: 27485059

Systematic Review of Peri-operative Prognostic Biomarkers in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Overview
Journal HPB (Oxford)
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2016 Aug 4
PMID 27485059
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continues to be associated with a poor prognosis. This systematic review aimed to summarize the literature regarding potential prognostic biomarkers to facilitate validation studies and clinical application.

Methods: A systematic review was performed (2004-2014) according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies were ranked using REMARK criteria and the following outcomes were examined: overall/disease free survival, nodal involvement, tumour characteristics, metastasis, recurrence and resectability.

Results: 256 biomarkers were identified in 158 studies. 171 biomarkers were assessed with respect to overall survival: urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor, atypical protein kinase C and HSP27 ranked the highest. 33 biomarkers were assessed for disease free survival: CD24 and S100A4 were the highest ranking. 17 biomarkers were identified for lymph node involvement: Smad4/Dpc4 and FOXC1 ranked highest. 13 biomarkers were examined for tumour grade: mesothelin and EGFR were the highest ranking biomarkers. 10 biomarkers were identified for metastasis: p16 and sCD40L were the highest ranking. 4 biomarkers were assessed resectability: sCD40L, s100a2, Ca 19-9, CEA.

Conclusion: This review has identified and ranked specific biomarkers that should be a primary focus of ongoing validation and clinical translational work in PDAC.

Citing Articles

Uncovering the clinicopathological features of early recurrence after surgical resection of pancreatic cancer.

Chon H, Lee H, Sung Y, Tae Y, Park C, Leem G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2942.

PMID: 38316853 PMC: 10844252. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52909-4.


Prognostic value of serum CEA and CA19-9 levels in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Ermiah E, Eddfair M, Abdulrahman O, Elfagieh M, Jebriel A, Al-Sharif M Mol Clin Oncol. 2022; 17(2):126.

PMID: 35832472 PMC: 9264325. DOI: 10.3892/mco.2022.2559.


S100 Proteins in Pancreatic Cancer: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.

Wu Y, Zhou Q, Guo F, Chen M, Tao X, Dong D Front Oncol. 2021; 11:711180.

PMID: 34527585 PMC: 8435722. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.711180.


Development and validation of a four-lipid metabolism gene signature for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Ye Y, Chen Z, Shen Y, Qin Y, Wang H FEBS Open Bio. 2021; 11(11):3153-3170.

PMID: 33386701 PMC: 8564347. DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.13074.


Has the non-resection rate decreased during the last two decades among patients undergoing surgical exploration for pancreatic adenocarcinoma?.

Mattevi C, Garnier J, Marchese U, Ewald J, Gilabert M, Poizat F BMC Surg. 2020; 20(1):176.

PMID: 32758203 PMC: 7430808. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00835-3.


References
1.
Juuti A, Nordling S, Lundin J, Louhimo J, Haglund C . Syndecan-1 expression--a novel prognostic marker in pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2005; 68(2-3):97-106. DOI: 10.1159/000085702. View

2.
Biankin A, Kench J, Colvin E, Segara D, Scarlett C, Nguyen N . Expression of S100A2 calcium-binding protein predicts response to pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2009; 137(2):558-68, 568.e1-11. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.009. View

3.
Liang J, Wang H, Rashid A, Tan T, Hwang R, Hamilton S . Expression of MAP4K4 is associated with worse prognosis in patients with stage II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008; 14(21):7043-9. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0381. View

4.
Guo S, Jing W, Hu X, Zhou X, Liu L, Zhu M . Decreased TIP30 expression predicts poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2013; 134(6):1369-78. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28471. View

5.
An X, Li Y, Lin X, Wang F, Feng F, Xu R . [Prognostic value of serum CA19-9 in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine based chemotherapy]. Ai Zheng. 2009; 28(3):286-91. View