» Articles » PMID: 27484368

Report on the Sixth Blind Test of Organic Crystal Structure Prediction Methods

Overview
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2016 Aug 4
PMID 27484368
Citations 104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The sixth blind test of organic crystal structure prediction (CSP) methods has been held, with five target systems: a small nearly rigid molecule, a polymorphic former drug candidate, a chloride salt hydrate, a co-crystal and a bulky flexible molecule. This blind test has seen substantial growth in the number of participants, with the broad range of prediction methods giving a unique insight into the state of the art in the field. Significant progress has been seen in treating flexible molecules, usage of hierarchical approaches to ranking structures, the application of density-functional approximations, and the establishment of new workflows and `best practices' for performing CSP calculations. All of the targets, apart from a single potentially disordered Z' = 2 polymorph of the drug candidate, were predicted by at least one submission. Despite many remaining challenges, it is clear that CSP methods are becoming more applicable to a wider range of real systems, including salts, hydrates and larger flexible molecules. The results also highlight the potential for CSP calculations to complement and augment experimental studies of organic solid forms.

Citing Articles

A robust crystal structure prediction method to support small molecule drug development with large scale validation and blind study.

Zhou D, Bier I, Santra B, Jacobson L, Wu C, Garaizar Suarez A Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2210.

PMID: 40044686 PMC: 11882951. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57479-1.


Large-Scale Parameter Estimation for Crystal Structure Prediction. Part 1: Dataset, Methodology, and Implementation.

Bowskill D, Tan B, Keates A, Sugden I, Adjiman C, Pantelides C J Chem Theory Comput. 2024; 20(22):10288-10315.

PMID: 39531362 PMC: 11603618. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01091.


Rapid prediction of molecular crystal structures using simple topological and physical descriptors.

Galanakis N, Tuckerman M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9757.

PMID: 39528448 PMC: 11555391. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53596-5.


Spiers Memorial Lecture: NMR crystallography.

Emsley L Faraday Discuss. 2024; 255(0):9-45.

PMID: 39405130 PMC: 11477664. DOI: 10.1039/d4fd00151f.


Equivariant Neural Networks Utilizing Molecular Clusters for Accurate Molecular Crystal Lattice Energy Predictions.

Gupta A, Stulajter M, Shaidu Y, Neaton J, de Jong W ACS Omega. 2024; 9(38):40269-40282.

PMID: 39346862 PMC: 11425815. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c07434.


References
1.
Neumann M, Leusen F, Kendrick J . A major advance in crystal structure prediction. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2008; 47(13):2427-30. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200704247. View

2.
Piana S, Reyhani M, Gale J . Simulating micrometre-scale crystal growth from solution. Nature. 2005; 438(7064):70-3. DOI: 10.1038/nature04173. View

3.
Eddleston M, Hejczyk K, Bithell E, Day G, Jones W . Polymorph identification and crystal structure determination by a combined crystal structure prediction and transmission electron microscopy approach. Chemistry. 2013; 19(24):7874-82. DOI: 10.1002/chem.201204368. View

4.
Galek P, Fabian L, Motherwell W, Allen F, Feeder N . Knowledge-based model of hydrogen-bonding propensity in organic crystals. Acta Crystallogr B. 2007; 63(Pt 5):768-82. DOI: 10.1107/S0108768107030996. View

5.
Groom C, Bruno I, Lightfoot M, Ward S . The Cambridge Structural Database. Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater. 2016; 72(Pt 2):171-9. PMC: 4822653. DOI: 10.1107/S2052520616003954. View