» Articles » PMID: 27478510

Comparison Between Adherence Assessments and Blood Glucose Monitoring Measures to Predict Glycemic Control in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2016 Aug 2
PMID 27478510
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Adherence to treatment has been defined as the degree to which a patient's behavior corresponds to medical or health advice; however, the most appropriate method to evaluate adherence to diabetes care has yet to be identified. We conducted analyses to compare adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures with regard to their ability to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: We analyzed four instruments to evaluate adherence: Self-Care Inventory-Revised, a self-administered survey; Diabetes Self-Monitoring Profile (DSMP), administered by trained researchers; a categorical (yes/no/sometimes) adherence self-evaluation; and a continuous (0-100) adherence self-evaluation. Blood glucose monitoring frequency was evaluated by self-report, diary, and meter download.

Results: Participants (n = 82) were aged 39.0 ± 13.1 years with a mean diabetes duration of 21.2 ± 11.1 years; 27 % monitored blood glucose >4 times/day. The DSMP score was the strongest predictor of glycemic control (r = -0.32, P = 0.004) among adherence assessments, while blood glucose monitoring frequency assessed by meter download was the strongest predictor among blood glucose monitoring measures (r = -40, P < 0.001). All the self-report assessments had a significant but weak correlation with glycemic control (r ≤ 0.28, P ≤ 0.02). The final adjusted model identified the assessment of blood glucose monitoring frequency by meter download as the most robust predictor of HbA1c (estimate effect size = -0.58, P = 0.003).

Conclusions: In efforts to evaluate adherence, blood glucose monitoring frequency assessed by meter download has the strongest relationship with glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Citing Articles

Factors associated with adherence to diabetes care recommendations among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a facility-based study in two urban diabetes clinics in Uganda.

Kyokunzire C, Matovu N, Mayega R Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2018; 11:93-104.

PMID: 29636626 PMC: 5880187. DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S156858.


Videoconferencing for Teens With Diabetes: Family Matters.

Duke D, Wagner D, Ulrich J, Freeman K, Harris M J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016; 10(4):816-23.

PMID: 27075708 PMC: 4928237. DOI: 10.1177/1932296816642577.

References
1.
Broadbent E, Donkin L, Stroh J . Illness and treatment perceptions are associated with adherence to medications, diet, and exercise in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34(2):338-40. PMC: 3024345. DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1779. View

2.
Telo G, Schaan de Souza M, Schaan B . Cross-cultural adaptation and validation to Brazilian Portuguese of two measuring adherence instruments for patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2015; 6:141. PMC: 4424533. DOI: 10.1186/1758-5996-6-141. View

3.
Mehta S, Nansel T, Volkening L, Butler D, Haynie D, Laffel L . Validation of a contemporary adherence measure for children with Type 1 diabetes: the Diabetes Management Questionnaire. Diabet Med. 2015; 32(9):1232-8. PMC: 4802856. DOI: 10.1111/dme.12682. View

4.
Miller K, Beck R, Bergenstal R, Goland R, Haller M, McGill J . Evidence of a strong association between frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels in T1D exchange clinic registry participants. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36(7):2009-14. PMC: 3687326. DOI: 10.2337/dc12-1770. View

5.
Markowitz J, Volkening L, Butler D, Antisdel-Lomaglio J, Anderson B, Laffel L . Re-examining a measure of diabetes-related burden in parents of young people with Type 1 diabetes: the Problem Areas in Diabetes Survey - Parent Revised version (PAID-PR). Diabet Med. 2011; 29(4):526-30. PMC: 3510480. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03434.x. View