» Articles » PMID: 27459247

Is Diffusion Tensor Imaging Useful in the Assessment of the Sciatic Nerve and Its Pathologies? Our Clinical Experience

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2016 Jul 27
PMID 27459247
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in the clinical setting as a complementary tool to conventional MRI in the study and assessment of the sciatic nerve and its pathologies.

Methods: 17 patients diagnosed with different types of sciatic neuropathy and 10 healthy controls underwent a conventional MRI and a DTI study in a 3-T MR scanner (Achieva(®) 3-T X-Series; Philips Healthcare, Netherlands).

Results: In the control group, we were able to track and visualize the common sciatic nerve and its main branches from hip to foot. In the patient group, the affected sciatic nerves presented statistically significant lower fractional anisotropy values and higher apparent diffusion coefficient values when compared with controls, suggesting nerve damage. In all cases, DTI offered complementary information for diagnosis and/or confirmation of the suspected pathology. When compared with conventional MRI, DTI showed higher sensitivity for nerve damage detection.

Conclusion: DTI offers a significant improvement and an important complement to visualize the sciatic nerve and its main branches. In patients with sciatic nerve pathology DTI allows to a better detection and characterization of the nerve damage.

Advances In Knowledge: DTI enables in vivo dissection of the sciatic nerve white matter fibres; its use offers a significant improvement and complement to conventional MRI.

Citing Articles

Role of MR Neurography for Evaluation of the Lumbosacral Plexus: A Scoping Review.

Kim S, Jung J J Korean Soc Radiol. 2022; 83(6):1273-1285.

PMID: 36545407 PMC: 9748467. DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2022.0001.


Lewis-Sumner syndrome: contribution of diffusion tensor imaging in its differential diagnosis.

Alfaro A, Picorelli S, Jimenez J, Garcia L, Bernabeu-Sanz A Skeletal Radiol. 2022; 52(6):1237-1242.

PMID: 36380244 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04236-w.


Comparison of region-of-interest delineation methods for diffusion tensor imaging in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.

Wu P, Huang C, Shi B, Jin A BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):677.

PMID: 35840941 PMC: 9284815. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05639-5.


Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility.

Preisner F, Behnisch R, Schwehr V, Godel T, Schwarz D, Foesleitner O Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:817316.

PMID: 35250457 PMC: 8888927. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.817316.


Diffusion tensor imaging in the musculoskeletal and peripheral nerve systems: from experimental to clinical applications.

Chianca V, Albano D, Messina C, Cinnante C, Triulzi F, Sardanelli F Eur Radiol Exp. 2018; 1(1):12.

PMID: 29708174 PMC: 5909344. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-017-0018-1.


References
1.
Pourmand R . Evaluating patients with suspected peripheral neuropathy: do the right thing, not everything. Muscle Nerve. 2002; 26(2):288-90. DOI: 10.1002/mus.10184. View

2.
Tagliafico A, Rescinito G, Monetti F, Villa A, Chiesa F, Fisci E . Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the normal breast: reproducibility of DTI-derived fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T. Radiol Med. 2012; 117(6):992-1003. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-012-0831-9. View

3.
Gutmann L . Pearls and pitfalls in the use of electromyography and nerve conduction studies. Semin Neurol. 2003; 23(1):77-82. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-40754. View

4.
Chhabra A, Lee P, Bizzell C, Soldatos T . 3 Tesla MR neurography--technique, interpretation, and pitfalls. Skeletal Radiol. 2011; 40(10):1249-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1183-6. View

5.
Morisaki S, Kawai Y, Umeda M, Nishi M, Oda R, Fujiwara H . In vivo assessment of peripheral nerve regeneration by diffusion tensor imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 33(3):535-42. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22442. View