Referrals to Integrative Medicine in a Tertiary Hospital: Findings from Electronic Health Record Data and Qualitative Interviews
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: To examine patterns of, and decision-making processes, informing referrals for inpatient access to integrative medicine (IM) services at a large, acute care hospital.
Design: Retrospective electronic health record review and structured qualitative interviews.
Setting: A 630-bed tertiary care hospital with an IM service available to inpatients.
Participants: IM referrals of all inpatients aged ≥18 years between July 2012 and December 2014 were identified using the hospital's electronic health record. Fifteen physicians, 15 nurses and 7 administrators were interviewed to better understand roles and perspectives in referring patients for IM services.
Results: In the study hospital, primary sources of referrals for IM services were the orthopaedic and neuroscience/spine service lines. While the largest absolute number of IM referrals was made for patients with lengths of stay of 3 days or fewer, a disproportionate number of total IM referrals was made for patients with long lengths of stay (≥10 days), compared with a smaller percentage of patients in the hospital with lengths of stay ≥10 days. Physicians and nurses were more likely to refer patients who displayed strong symptoms (eg, pain and anxiety) and/or did not respond to conventional therapies. IM referrals were predominantly nurse-initiated. A built-in delay in the time from referral initiation to service delivery discouraged referrals of some patients.
Conclusions: Conventional providers refer patients for IM services when these services are available in a tertiary hospital. Referral patterns are influenced by patient characteristics, operational features and provider perspectives. Nurses play a key role in the referral process. Overcoming cultural and knowledge differences between conventional and IM providers is likely to be a continuing challenge to providing IM in inpatient settings.
Zhou H, Austin R, Lu S, Silverman G, Zhou Y, Kilicoglu H J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023; 31(2):426-434.
PMID: 37952122 PMC: 10797266. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad216.
Rodgers-Melnick S, Rivard R, Block S, Dusek J J Integr Complement Med. 2023; 30(1):57-65.
PMID: 37433198 PMC: 10795501. DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2022.0701.
Virtual reality for management of cancer pain: Study rationale and design.
Groninger H, Stewart D, Wesley D, Cowgill J, Mete M Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022; 26:100895.
PMID: 35128143 PMC: 8800065. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100895.
Gray M, LaForge K, Livingston C, Leichtling G, Choo E J Altern Complement Med. 2021; 27(10):868-875.
PMID: 34264748 PMC: 9009591. DOI: 10.1089/acm.2021.0099.
Ho E, Thompson-Lastad A, Lam R, Zhang X, Thompson N, Chao M J Altern Complement Med. 2021; 27(5):398-406.
PMID: 33902333 PMC: 8126418. DOI: 10.1089/acm.2020.0387.