» Articles » PMID: 27456080

Predicting Prolonged Dose Titration in Patients Starting Warfarin

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2016 Jul 27
PMID 27456080
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Patients initiating warfarin therapy generally experience a dose-titration period of weeks to months, during which time they are at higher risk of both thromboembolic and bleeding events. Accurate prediction of prolonged dose titration could help clinicians determine which patients might be better treated by alternative anticoagulants that, while more costly, do not require dose titration.

Methods: A prediction model was derived in a prospective cohort of patients starting warfarin (n = 390), using Cox regression, and validated in an external cohort (n = 663) from a later time period. Prolonged dose titration was defined as a dose-titration period >12 weeks. Predictor variables were selected using a modified best subsets algorithm, using leave-one-out cross-validation to reduce overfitting.

Results: The final model had five variables: warfarin indication, insurance status, number of doctor's visits in the previous year, smoking status, and heart failure. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) in the derivation cohort was 0.66 (95%CI 0.60, 0.74) using leave-one-out cross-validation, but only 0.59 (95%CI 0.54, 0.64) in the external validation cohort, and varied across clinics. Including genetic factors in the model did not improve the area under the ROC curve (0.59; 95%CI 0.54, 0.65). Relative utility curves indicated that the model was unlikely to provide a clinically meaningful benefit compared with no prediction.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that prolonged dose titration cannot be accurately predicted in warfarin patients using traditional clinical, social, and genetic predictors, and that accurate prediction will need to accommodate heterogeneities across clinical sites and over time. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Citing Articles

A Systematic Review of Polygenic Models for Predicting Drug Outcomes.

Siemens A, Anderson S, Rassekh S, Ross C, Carleton B J Pers Med. 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 36143179 PMC: 9505711. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091394.


Ethnic Diversity and Warfarin Pharmacogenomics.

Asiimwe I, Pirmohamed M Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:866058.

PMID: 35444556 PMC: 9014219. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.866058.


Warfarin dosing algorithms: A systematic review.

Asiimwe I, Zhang E, Osanlou R, Jorgensen A, Pirmohamed M Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020; 87(4):1717-1729.

PMID: 33080066 PMC: 8056736. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14608.


Evaluation of - and -based pharmacogenetic algorithm for warfarin dose in Gaza-Palestine.

Ayesh B, Abu Shaaban A, Abed A Future Sci OA. 2018; 4(3):FSO276.

PMID: 29568565 PMC: 5859345. DOI: 10.4155/fsoa-2017-0112.

References
1.
Platt A, Russell Localio A, Brensinger C, Cruess D, Christie J, Gross R . Risk factors for nonadherence to warfarin: results from the IN-RANGE study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008; 17(9):853-60. PMC: 2919157. DOI: 10.1002/pds.1556. View

2.
Gage B, Yan Y, E Milligan P, Waterman A, Culverhouse R, Rich M . Clinical classification schemes for predicting hemorrhage: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (NRAF). Am Heart J. 2006; 151(3):713-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.017. View

3.
Arnsten J, Gelfand J, Singer D . Determinants of compliance with anticoagulation: A case-control study. Am J Med. 1997; 103(1):11-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)90048-6. View

4.
Dantas G, Thompson B, Manson J, Tracy C, Upshur R . Patients' perspectives on taking warfarin: qualitative study in family practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2004; 5:15. PMC: 509246. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-5-15. View

5.
Baker S, Cook N, Vickers A, Kramer B . Using relative utility curves to evaluate risk prediction. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2010; 172(4):729-748. PMC: 2804257. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00592.x. View