» Articles » PMID: 2745471

The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Measuring Segment Inertial Properties

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 1989 Jan 1
PMID 2745471
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine whether valid measures of segment inertial properties can be generated from a series of cross-sectional tissue scans using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The cross-sectional images for eight baboon cadaver segments (four forearms, two upper arms, and two lower legs) were digitized to yield areas of muscle, bone, and fat tissues. These data, along with tissue density values, were used for calculations of segment volume (V), density (D), mass (M), center of mass location (CM), and moment of inertia (Icm) about a transverse axis through the segment center of mass. Criterion measures of these properties were obtained using standard experimental techniques. Close agreement was found between criterion and MRI values for mean segment CM (44.67 vs. 43.36% from proximal end, respectively) while mean segment D was the same (1.124 g.cm-3) for both methods. MRI procedures tended to overestimate segment V(595.3 vs. 633.4 cm3), M(720.0 vs. 769.9 g), and Icm (3.208 vs. 3.332 x 10(-3) kg.m2). It was concluded that MRI represents a promising technique for generating valid measures of segment inertial characteristics as well as other anatomical features.

Citing Articles

Role of forelimb morphology in muscle sensorimotor functions during locomotion in the cat.

Rahmati S, Klishko A, Martin R, Bunderson N, Meslie J, Nichols T J Physiol. 2024; 603(2):447-487.

PMID: 39705066 PMC: 11737544. DOI: 10.1113/JP287448.


Subject-specific trunk segmental masses prediction for musculoskeletal models using artificial neural networks.

Liu T, El-Rich M Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024; 62(9):2757-2768.

PMID: 38693326 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-024-03100-4.


The Lower Limbs of Sprinters Have Larger Relative Mass But Not Larger Normalized Moment of Inertia than Controls.

Sado N, Ichinose H, Kawakami Y Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023; 55(3):590-600.

PMID: 36730966 PMC: 9924968. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003064.


Whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry demonstrates better reliability than segmental body composition analysis in college-aged students.

Kutac P, Bunc V, Sigmund M PLoS One. 2019; 14(4):e0215599.

PMID: 31009495 PMC: 6476531. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215599.


A low-cost three-dimensional laser surface scanning approach for defining body segment parameters.

Pandis P, Bull A Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2017; 231(11):1064-1068.

PMID: 28814154 PMC: 5639961. DOI: 10.1177/0954411917727031.