» Articles » PMID: 27453712

Confronting Practical Problems for Initiation of On-line Hemodiafiltration Therapy

Overview
Date 2016 Jul 26
PMID 27453712
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conventional hemodialysis, which is based on the diffusive transport of solutes, is the most widely used renal replacement therapy. It effectively removes small solutes such as urea and corrects fluid, electrolyte and acid-base imbalance. However, solute diffusion coefficients decreased rapidly as molecular size increased. Because of this, middle and large molecules are not removed effectively and clinical problem such as dialysis amyloidosis might occur. Online hemodiafiltration which is combined by diffusive and convective therapies can overcome such problems by removing effectively middle and large solutes. Online hemodiafiltration is safe, very effective, economically affordable, improving session tolerance and may improve the mortality superior to high flux hemodialysis. However, there might be some potential limitations for setting up online hemodiafiltaration. In this article, we review the uremic toxins associated with dialysis, definition of hemodiafiltration, indication and prescription of hemodiafiltration and the limitations of setting up hemodiafiltration.

Citing Articles

Cardiovascular Risk Comparison between Expanded Hemodialysis Using Theranova and Online Hemodiafiltration (CARTOON): A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lee Y, Jang M, Jeon J, Lee J, Huh W, Choi B Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):10807.

PMID: 34031503 PMC: 8144214. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90311-6.


Effects of online hemodiafiltration on anemia and nutritional status in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Lee Y, Shin Y, Lee S, Kim Y, Lee S, Moon J Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2020; 39(1):103-111.

PMID: 32036641 PMC: 7105619. DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.19.082.


Online hemodiafiltration and mortality risk in end-stage renal disease patients: A critical appraisal of current evidence.

Schiffl H Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2019; 38(2):159-168.

PMID: 31137926 PMC: 6577208. DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.18.0160.


Prescribing Hemodialysis or Hemodiafiltration: When One Size Does Not Fit All the Proposal of a Personalized Approach Based on Comorbidity and Nutritional Status.

Piccoli G, Nielsen L, Gendrot L, Fois A, Cataldo E, Cabiddu G J Clin Med. 2018; 7(10).

PMID: 30297628 PMC: 6210736. DOI: 10.3390/jcm7100331.

References
1.
Akizawa T, Koiwa F . Clinical Expectation of Online Hemodiafiltration: A Japanese Perspective. Blood Purif. 2015; 40 Suppl 1:12-6. DOI: 10.1159/000437405. View

2.
Vanholder R, Davenport A, Hannedouche T, Kooman J, Kribben A, Lameire N . Reimbursement of dialysis: a comparison of seven countries. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012; 23(8):1291-8. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2011111094. View

3.
Vanholder R, De Smet R, Glorieux G, Argiles A, Baurmeister U, Brunet P . Review on uremic toxins: classification, concentration, and interindividual variability. Kidney Int. 2003; 63(5):1934-43. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00924.x. View

4.
Canaud B, Levesque R, Krieter D, Desmeules S, Chalabi L, Moragues H . On-line hemodiafiltration as routine treatment of end-stage renal failure: why pre- or mixed dilution mode is necessary in on-line hemodiafiltration today?. Blood Purif. 2005; 22 Suppl 2:40-8. DOI: 10.1159/000081874. View

5.
Canaud B, Chenine L, Henriet D, Leray H . Online hemodiafiltration: a multipurpose therapy for improving quality of renal replacement therapy. Contrib Nephrol. 2008; 161:191-198. DOI: 10.1159/000130677. View