» Articles » PMID: 27449661

Comparison of Urine Output Among Patients Treated with More Intensive Versus Less Intensive RRT: Results from the Acute Renal Failure Trial Network Study

Overview
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2016 Jul 25
PMID 27449661
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: Intensive RRT may have adverse effects that account for the absence of benefit observed in randomized trials of more intensive versus less intensive RRT. We wished to determine the association of more intensive RRT with changes in urine output as a marker of worsening residual renal function in critically ill patients with severe AKI.

Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: The Acute Renal Failure Trial Network Study (n=1124) was a multicenter trial that randomized critically ill patients requiring initiation of RRT to more intensive (hemodialysis or sustained low-efficiency dialysis six times per week or continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration at 35 ml/kg per hour) versus less intensive (hemodialysis or sustained low-efficiency dialysis three times per week or continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration at 20 ml/kg per hour) RRT. Mixed linear regression models were fit to estimate the association of RRT intensity with change in daily urine output in survivors through day 7 (n=871); Cox regression models were fit to determine the association of RRT intensity with time to ≥50% decline in urine output in all patients through day 28.

Results: Mean age of participants was 60±15 years old, 72% were men, and 30% were diabetic. In unadjusted models, among patients who survived ≥7 days, mean urine output was, on average, 31.7 ml/d higher (95% confidence interval, 8.2 to 55.2 ml/d) for the less intensive group compared with the more intensive group (P=0.01). More intensive RRT was associated with 29% greater unadjusted risk of decline in urine output of ≥50% (hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 1.51).

Conclusions: More intensive versus less intensive RRT is associated with a greater reduction in urine output during the first 7 days of therapy and a greater risk of developing a decline in urine output of ≥50% in critically ill patients with severe AKI.

Citing Articles

Focus on oliguria during renal replacement therapy.

Zhang Q, Wang X, Chao Y, Liu L J Anesth. 2024; 38(5):681-691.

PMID: 38777933 PMC: 11415420. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-024-03342-4.


The relationship between commencement of continuous renal replacement therapy and urine output, fluid balance, mean arterial pressure and vasopressor dose.

Sansom B, Tonkin-Hill G, Kalfas S, Park S, Presneill J, Bellomo R Crit Care Resusc. 2023; 24(3):259-267.

PMID: 38046211 PMC: 10692613. DOI: 10.51893/2022.3.OA5.


Current management of fluid balance in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: A scoping review.

White K, Nasser A, Gatton M, Laupland K Crit Care Resusc. 2023; 25(3):126-135.

PMID: 37876369 PMC: 10581269. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.06.002.


A clinical model to predict successful renal replacement therapy (RRT) discontinuation in patients with Acute Kidney Injury (AKI).

Valle E, Smolentzov I, Gorzoni J, Salgado I, Mainardes L, Gomes V Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2023; 78:100280.

PMID: 37690142 PMC: 10497780. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100280.


Impact of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Initiation on Urine Output and Fluid Balance: A Multicenter Study.

White K, Laupland K, See E, Serpa-Neto A, Bellomo R Blood Purif. 2023; 52(6):532-540.

PMID: 37071971 PMC: 11226201. DOI: 10.1159/000530146.