» Articles » PMID: 27445637

Method to Reduce the False-Positive Rate of Loss of Resistance in the Cervical Epidural Region

Overview
Journal Pain Res Manag
Date 2016 Jul 23
PMID 27445637
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background. The cervical epidural space can be detected by the loss of resistance (LOR) technique which is commonly performed using air. However, this technique using air has been associated with a high false-positive LOR rate during cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injections (CIESIs). Objective. We investigated whether the detection of LOR with contrast medium might reduce the false-positive LOR rate on the first attempt. Methods. We obtained data retrospectively. A total of 79 patients were divided into two groups according to the LOR technique. Groups 1 and 2 patients underwent CIESI with the LOR technique using air or contrast medium. During the procedure, the injection technique (median or paramedian approach), final depth, LOR technique (air or contrast), total number of LOR attempts, and any side effects were recorded. Results. The mean values for the total number of LOR attempts were 1.38 ± 0.65 (Group 1) and 1.07 ± 0.25 (Group 2). The false-positive rate on the first attempt was 29.4% and 6.6% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.012). Conclusions. The use of contrast medium for LOR technique is associated with a lower rate of false-positivity compared with the use of air.

Citing Articles

Identification of cervical epidural space: A comparison study between contrast spread and loss of resistance techniques.

Perper Y Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023; 3:1000209.

PMID: 36618582 PMC: 9811639. DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2022.1000209.


Direct Visualization of Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Injections Using Sonography.

Maeda N, Maeda M, Tanaka Y Tomography. 2022; 8(4):1869-1880.

PMID: 35894022 PMC: 9341393. DOI: 10.3390/tomography8040157.


Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a retrospective comparative study.

Park K, Lee W, Nam S, Kim M, Park Y J Ultrasound. 2018; 22(2):167-177.

PMID: 30519991 PMC: 6531573. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-018-0344-z.


Analysis of epidural waveform for cervical epidural steroid injections confirmed with fluoroscopy.

Hong J, Jung S Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(13):e0202.

PMID: 29595657 PMC: 5895410. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010202.


Optimal volume of injectate for fluoroscopy-guided cervical interlaminar epidural injection in patients with neck and upper extremity pain.

Park J, Kim D, Lee K, Choi S, Leem J Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(43):e5206.

PMID: 27787378 PMC: 5089107. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005206.

References
1.
Lieberman R, Dreyfuss P, Baker R . Fluoroscopically guided interlaminar cervical epidural injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84(10):1568-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.072. View

2.
Landers M, Dreyfuss P, Bogduk N . On the geometry of fluoroscopy views for cervical interlaminar epidural injections. Pain Med. 2011; 13(1):58-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01291.x. View

3.
Lirk P, Colvin J, Steger B, Colvin H, Keller C, Rieder J . Incidence of lower thoracic ligamentum flavum midline gaps. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 94(6):852-5. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei133. View

4.
Lim H, Cha Y, Song J, Park J, Lee M . Asymptomatic pneumomediastinum resulting from air in the epidural space -a case report-. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013; 65(3):266-9. PMC: 3790041. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.3.266. View

5.
Botwin K, Castellanos R, Rao S, Hanna A, Torres-Ramos F, Gruber R . Complications of fluoroscopically guided interlaminar cervical epidural injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84(5):627-33. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(02)04862-1. View