» Articles » PMID: 27444828

Laparoscopic Versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Patients with Obesity: an American College of Surgeons NSQIP Clinical Outcomes Analysis

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Jul 23
PMID 27444828
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The laparoscopic approach to inguinal hernia repair (IHR) has proven beneficial in reducing postoperative pain and facilitating earlier return to normal activity. Except for indications such as recurrent or bilateral inguinal hernias, there remains a paucity of data that specifically identities patient populations that would benefit most from the laparoscopic approach to IHR. Nevertheless, previous experience has shown that obese patients have increased wound morbidity following open surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a laparoscopic versus open surgical approach to IHR on early postoperative morbidity and mortality in the obese population using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

Methods: All IHRs were identified within the NSQIP database from 2005 to 2013. Obesity was defined as a body mass index ≥30 kg/m. A propensity score matching technique between the laparoscopic and open approaches was used. Association of obesity with postoperative outcomes was investigated using an adjusted and unadjusted model based on clinically important preoperative variables identified by the propensity scoring system.

Results: A total of 7346 patients met inclusion criteria; 5573 patients underwent laparoscopic IHR, while 1773 patients underwent open IHR. On univariate analysis, obese patients who underwent laparoscopic IHR were less likely to experience a deep surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, or return to the operating room compared with those who underwent an open IHR. In both the adjusted and unadjusted propensity score models, there was no difference in outcomes between those who underwent laparoscopic versus open IHR.

Conclusions: The laparoscopic approach to IHR in obese patients has similar outcomes as an open approach with regard to 30-day wound events. Preoperative risk stratification of obese patients is important to determining the appropriate surgical approach to IHR. Further studies are needed to investigate the long-term effects of the open and laparoscopic approaches to IHR in the obese population.

Citing Articles

Acceptance of Open Preperitoneal Repair in Inguinal Hernia Surgery Delphi-Consensus After an Anonymous International Survey Among European Hernia Society Members.

Lorenz R, Akkersdijk W, Paiva De Oliveira G, Warren T, Soler M J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025; 3:13840.

PMID: 39967918 PMC: 11833113. DOI: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13840.


Higher rates of recurrence and worse quality of life in obese patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.

Attaar M, Forester B, Kuchta K, Ujiki M, Linn J, Denham W Hernia. 2024; 28(6):2255-2264.

PMID: 39230645 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03154-1.


QUALITY OF LIFE USING EURAHS-QoL SCORES AFTER SURGICAL TREATMENT OF INGUINAL HERNIA: LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL (TAPP) AND LICHTENSTEIN TECHNIQUES.

Sanderson R, DE-Marchi D, Cesario J, Sanderson L, Zilberstein B Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024; 37:e1798.

PMID: 38896698 PMC: 11182626. DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020240005e1798.


A Long-Term Study on Recurrence, Chronic Pain, and Quality of Life in Obese Patients with Groin Hernia undergoing Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair: Comparison between Mesh Fixation and Nonfixation Techniques.

Das S, Das G, Naik A, Das S, Prabhakar C, Kudagi V J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024; 16(Suppl 1):S362-S364.

PMID: 38595529 PMC: 11001065. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_580_23.


LIECHTENSTEIN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL (TAPP) HERNIA REPAIR: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY FOCUSED ON POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES IN A GENERAL SURGERY UNIT.

Gomes C, Gomes F, Podda M, Braga A, Ribeiro S, Vaz L Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2022; 34(4):e1642.

PMID: 35107504 PMC: 8846489. DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020210002e1642.


References
1.
Rosemar A, Angeras U, Rosengren A . Body mass index and groin hernia: a 34-year follow-up study in Swedish men. Ann Surg. 2008; 247(6):1064-8. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816b4399. View

2.
Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons Jr R, Dunlop D, Gibbs J . Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(18):1819-27. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040093. View

3.
Tadaki C, Lomelin D, Simorov A, Jones R, Humphreys M, Dasilva M . Perioperative outcomes and costs of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2016; 20(3):399-404. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-016-1465-y. View

4.
Simons M, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot J, Campanelli G, Conze J . European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009; 13(4):343-403. PMC: 2719730. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7. View

5.
Froylich D, Segal M, Weinstein A, Hatib K, Shiloni E, Hazzan D . Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in obese patients: a long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2015; 30(2):670-675. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4258-y. View