» Articles » PMID: 27444509

Long-Term Impact of Right Ventricular Pacing on Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Pacemaker Recipients With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results From a Large Single-Center Registry

Overview
Date 2016 Jul 23
PMID 27444509
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is limited evidence of long-term impact of right ventricular pacing on left ventricular (LV) systolic function in pacemaker recipients with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF). The objective of the study was to evaluate the outcome and echocardiographic course of baseline preserved LVEF in a large cohort of pacemaker recipients with respect to pacing indication and degree of right ventricular pacing.

Methods And Results: We enrolled 991 patients (73±10 years, 54% male) with baseline normal (>55%) LVEF (n=791) or mildly reduced (41-55%) LVEF (n=200) who had paired echocardiographic data on LV systolic function recorded at implantation and last follow-up. According to pacing indication, patients were divided into atrioventricular block group A (n=500) and sinus node disease group B (n=491). Main outcome measures were all-cause mortality and deterioration of LV function ≥2 LVEF categories at last follow-up. Patients were followed for an average of 44 months. Death from any cause occurred in 166 (17%), and deterioration of LV function ≥2 LVEF categories in 56 (6%) patients. There was no significant difference in outcome between group A and group B either in patients with normal LVEF or in those with mildly reduced LVEF. Mean percentage of right ventricular pacing was not predictive of outcome.

Conclusions: In a large cohort of pacemaker recipients with predominantly normal LVEF, clinically relevant LV dysfunction develops rather infrequently. No significant difference in all-cause mortality and development of severe LV dysfunction is observed between patients with atrioventricular block and sinus node disease. Accordingly, de novo biventricular pacing cannot be recommended for patients with preserved LVEF.

Citing Articles

Long term clinical outcomes in patients requiring cardiac pacing due to congenital complete heart block.

Seitler S, Rafiq I, Behar J Int J Cardiol Congenit Heart Dis. 2024; 9:100337.

PMID: 39713551 PMC: 11657791. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcchd.2022.100337.


Evaluation of Right Heart Structure and Function in Pacemaker-dependent Patients by Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography: A 1-Year Prospective Cohort Study.

Mei Y, Han R, Cheng L, Li H, He Y, Liu W Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(11):408.

PMID: 39618867 PMC: 11607507. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2511408.


Dual-chamber pacing confers better myocardial performance and improves clinical outcomes compared to single-chamber pacing.

Mohan B, Batta A World J Cardiol. 2024; 16(11):626-631.

PMID: 39600992 PMC: 11586728. DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i11.626.


[Different phenotypes of mitral regurgitation in patients with right apical ventricular pacing: an echocardiographic approach in a heterogeneity of clinical scenarios].

Chango Azanza D, Munin M, Raggio I, Perea G, Carbajales J Arch Peru Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2024; 2(2):112-120.

PMID: 38274564 PMC: 10809778. DOI: 10.47487/apcyccv.v2i2.130.


Global longitudinal strain as a risk factor for pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: another step toward mechanistic insight and prevention strategies.

Eaves S, Lipton J J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023; 67(2):241-242.

PMID: 38055161 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-023-01701-x.


References
1.
Funck R, Blanc J, Mueller H, Schade-Brittinger C, Bailleul C, Maisch B . Biventricular stimulation to prevent cardiac desynchronization: rationale, design, and endpoints of the 'Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization (BioPace)' study. Europace. 2006; 8(8):629-35. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eul075. View

2.
Delgado V, Tops L, Trines S, Zeppenfeld K, Ajmone Marsan N, Bertini M . Acute effects of right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular synchrony and mechanics. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2(2):135-45. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.814608. View

3.
Chan J, Fang F, Zhang Q, Fung J, Razali O, Azlan H . Biventricular pacing is superior to right ventricular pacing in bradycardia patients with preserved systolic function: 2-year results of the PACE trial. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32(20):2533-40. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr336. View

4.
Tops L, Schalij M, Holman E, van Erven L, van der Wall E, Bax J . Right ventricular pacing can induce ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular node ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48(8):1642-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.072. View

5.
Epstein A, DiMarco J, Ellenbogen K, Estes 3rd N, Freedman R, Gettes L . ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002.... Circulation. 2008; 117(21):e350-408. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCUALTIONAHA.108.189742. View