» Articles » PMID: 27435170

Using a Positive Deviance Framework to Identify Local Health Departments in Communities with Exceptional Maternal and Child Health Outcomes: a Cross Sectional Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2016 Jul 21
PMID 27435170
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The United States spends more than most other countries per capita on maternal and child health (MCH), and yet lags behind other countries in MCH outcomes. Local health departments (LHDs) are responsible for administering various maternal and child health programs and interventions, especially to vulnerable populations. The goal of this study was to identify local health department jurisdictions (LHDs) that had exceptional maternal and child health outcomes compared to their in-state peers - positive deviants (PDs) - in Washington, Florida and New York in order to support the identification of strategies that can improve community health outcomes.

Methods: We used MCH expenditure data for all LHDs in FL (n = 67), and WA (n = 35), and most LHDs in NY (n = 48) for 2009-2010 from the Public Health Activities and Services Tracking (PHAST) database. We conducted our analysis in 2014-2015. Data were linked with variables depicting local context and LHD structure. We used a cross-sectional study design to identify communities with better than expected MCH outcomes and multiple regression analysis to control for factors outside of and within LHD control.

Results: We identified 50 positive deviant LHD jurisdictions across 3 states: WA = 10 (29 %); FL = 24 (36 %); NY = 16 (33 %). Overall, internal factor variables improved model fit for identifying PD LHD jurisdictions, but individual variables were not significant.

Conclusions: We empirically identified LHD jurisdictions with better MCH outcomes compared to their peers. Research is needed to assess what factors contributed to these exceptional MCH outcomes and over which LHDs have control. The positive deviance method we used to identify high performing local health jurisdictions in the area of maternal and child health outcomes can assist in better understanding what practices work to improve health outcomes. We found that funding may not be the only predictor of exceptional outcomes, but rather, there may be activities that positive deviant LHDs are conducting that lead to improved outcomes, even during difficult financial circumstances. This method can be applied to other outcomes, communities, and/or services.

Citing Articles

Effect of positive deviation on the diagnosis and treatment of gestational syphilis, and the prevention of congenital syphilis: A cohort study.

Olarte N, Valderrama I, Castellanos J, Raba A, Jimenez J, Mojica J Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2025; 75(4).

PMID: 39913793 PMC: 11812095. DOI: 10.18597/rcog.4198.


Using positive deviance to enhance HIV care retention in South Africa: development of a compassion-focused program to improve the staff and patient experience.

Ober A, Skinner D, Bogart L, Busakwe L, Davids W, Mahomed H BMC Glob Public Health. 2025; 3(1):8.

PMID: 39910645 PMC: 11800582. DOI: 10.1186/s44263-025-00123-3.


Using Positive Deviance to Enhance HIV Care Retention in South Africa: Development of a Compassion-Focused Programme to Improve the Staff and Patient Experience.

Ober A, Skinner D, Bogart L, Busakwe L, Davids W, Mahomed H Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39281882 PMC: 11398554. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4882407/v1.


The use of positive deviance approach to improve health service delivery and quality of care: a scoping review.

Kassie A, Eakin E, Abate B, Endalamaw A, Zewdie A, Wolka E BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):438.

PMID: 38589897 PMC: 11003118. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10850-2.


Investigating improvements in premature death in two rural, majority-minority counties in the south.

Lyn R, Heath E, Torres A, Andrews C SSM Popul Health. 2020; 11:100618.

PMID: 32642547 PMC: 7334465. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100618.


References
1.
Mays G, Smith S . Geographic variation in public health spending: correlates and consequences. Health Serv Res. 2009; 44(5 Pt 2):1796-817. PMC: 2758407. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01014.x. View

2.
Berwick D . The science of improvement. JAMA. 2008; 299(10):1182-4. DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.10.1182. View

3.
Yang Y, Bekemeier B . Using more activities to address health disparities: local health departments and their "top executives". J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013; 19(2):153-61. DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318252ee41. View

4.
Walker L, Sterling B, Hoke M, Dearden K . Applying the concept of positive deviance to public health data: a tool for reducing health disparities. Public Health Nurs. 2007; 24(6):571-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2007.00670.x. View

5.
Boulton M, Beck A, Coronado F, Merrill J, Friedman C, Stamas G . Public health workforce taxonomy. Am J Prev Med. 2014; 47(5 Suppl 3):S314-23. PMC: 7004229. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.015. View