» Articles » PMID: 27434542

The Avahan Transition: Effects of Transition Readiness on Program Institutionalization and Sustained Outcomes

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Jul 20
PMID 27434542
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: With declines in development assistance for health and growing interest in country ownership, donors are increasingly faced with the task of transitioning health programs to local actors towards a path to sustainability. Yet there is little available guidance on how to measure and evaluate the success of a transition and its subsequent effects. This study assesses the transition of the Avahan HIV/AIDS prevention program in India to investigate how preparations for transition affected continuation of program activities post-transition.

Methods: Two rounds of two surveys were conducted and supplemented by data from government and Avahan Computerized Management Information Systems (CMIS). Exploratory factor analysis was used to develop two measures: 1) transition readiness pre-transition, and 2) institutionalization (i.e. integration of initial program systems into organizational procedures and behaviors) post-transition. A fixed effects model was built to examine changes in key program delivery outcomes over time. An ordinary least square regression was used to assess the relationship between transition readiness and sustainability of service outcomes both directly, and indirectly through institutionalization.

Results: Transition readiness data revealed 3 factors (capacity, alignment and communication), on a 15-item scale with adequate internal consistency (alpha 0.73). Institutionalization was modeled as a unidimensional construct, and a 12-item scale demonstrated moderate internal consistency (alpha 0.60). Coverage of key populations and condom distribution were sustained compared to pre-transition levels (p<0.01). Transition readiness, but not institutionalization, predicted sustained outcomes post-transition. Transition readiness did not necessarily lead to institutionalization of key program elements one year after transition.

Conclusion: Greater preparedness prior to transition is important to achieve better service delivery outcomes post-transition. This paper illustrates a methodology to measure transition readiness pre-transition to identify less ready organizations or program components in advance, improving the likelihood of service sustainability. Further research is needed around the conceptualization and development of measures of institutionalization and its effects on long-term program sustainability.

Citing Articles

Integrating interventions supported by development assistance for health into local health system: evidence from a China-World Bank-UK rural health system strengthening project (1998-2007).

Huang A, Zhao Y, Cao C, Lyu M, Tang K BMJ Glob Health. 2024; 9(5).

PMID: 38789275 PMC: 11129031. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012853.


Managing transitions from external assistance: cross-national learning about sustaining effective coverage.

Shroff Z, Sparkes S, Paina L, Skarphedinsdottir M, Gotsadze G, Zakumumpa H Health Policy Plan. 2024; 39(Supplement_1):i50-i64.

PMID: 38253447 PMC: 10977916. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czad101.


Geographic prioritisation in Kenya and Uganda: a power analysis of donor transition.

Paina L, Rodriguez D, Zakumumpa H, Mackenzie C, Ssengooba F, Bennett S BMJ Glob Health. 2023; 8(5).

PMID: 37236658 PMC: 10230869. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010499.


From External to Local: Opportunities and Lessons Learned from Transitioning COMSA-Mozambique.

Rodriguez D, Macicame I, Adriano A, Chicumbe S, Duce P, Kante A Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023; 108(5_Suppl):47-55.

PMID: 37037432 PMC: 10160856. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0284.


The impacts of donor transitions on health systems in middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Huffstetler H, Bandara S, Bharali I, McDade K, Mao W, Guo F Health Policy Plan. 2022; 37(9):1188-1202.

PMID: 35904274 PMC: 9558870. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czac063.


References
1.
Bennett S, Rodriguez D, Ozawa S, Singh K, Bohren M, Chhabra V . Management practices to support donor transition: lessons from Avahan, the India AIDS Initiative. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015; 15:232. PMC: 4465612. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0894-0. View

2.
Katz I, Glandon D, Wong W, Kargbo B, Ombam R, Singh S . Lessons learned from stakeholder-driven sustainability analysis of six national HIV programmes. Health Policy Plan. 2013; 29(3):379-87. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czt024. View

3.
Shen A, Farrell M, Vandenbroucke M, Fox E, Pablos-Mendez A . Applying lessons learned from the USAID family planning graduation experience to the GAVI graduation process. Health Policy Plan. 2014; 30(6):687-95. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czu045. View

4.
Bennett S, Singh S, Ozawa S, Tran N, Kang J . Sustainability of donor programs: evaluating and informing the transition of a large HIV prevention program in India to local ownership. Glob Health Action. 2011; 4. PMC: 3241943. DOI: 10.3402/gha.v4i0.7360. View

5.
Sarriot E, Winch P, Ryan L, Bowie J, Kouletio M, Swedberg E . A methodological approach and framework for sustainability assessment in NGO-implemented primary health care programs. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2004; 19(1):23-41. DOI: 10.1002/hpm.744. View