» Articles » PMID: 27434393

Pharmacodynamic Effects of Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide and Sevelamer Carbonate on Vitamin D Receptor Agonist Bioactivity in Dialysis Patients

Overview
Journal Am J Nephrol
Publisher Karger
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2016 Jul 20
PMID 27434393
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Many patients with chronic kidney disease are prescribed vitamin D receptor agonists (VDRAs) for the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Oral phosphate binders may interact with, and potentially reduce the therapeutic activity of, oral VDRAs. This post hoc analysis of a Phase 3 study evaluated the pharmacodynamic effects of the iron-based phosphate binder sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH) and sevelamer (SEV) carbonate on VDRA activity in dialysis patients.

Methods: One thousand and fifty nine patients were randomized to SFOH 1.0-3.0 g/day (n = 710) or SEV 2.4-14.4 g/day (n = 349) for up to 52 weeks. Potential interactions of SFOH and SEV with VDRAs were assessed using serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) concentrations as a pharmacodynamic biomarker. Three populations of SFOH- and SEV-treated patients were analyzed: Population 1 (n = 187), patients taking concomitant stable doses of oral VDRAs only; Population 2 (n = 250), patients taking no concomitant VDRAs; Population 3 (n = 68), patients taking concomitant stable doses of intravenous paricalcitol only. Populations were compared using a mixed-effects model to obtain the least squares mean change in iPTH from baseline to Week 52. Differences between treatment groups were also compared.

Results: In Population 1, iPTH decreased from baseline to Week 52 in the SFOH group (-25.3 pg/ml) but increased in the SEV group (89.8 pg/ml) (p = 0.02). In Population 2, iPTH increased to a similar extent in both treatment groups. In Population 3, iPTH concentrations in both treatment groups decreased to a similar degree (-29.6 and -11.4 pg/ml for SFOH and SEV, respectively; p = 0.87).

Conclusions: In contrast with SEV, SFOH did not appear to impact the iPTH-lowering effect of oral VDRAs.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide versus sevelamer carbonate: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Georgopoulos C, Duni A, Stamellou E, Kitsos A, Gouva C, Dounousi E Hemodial Int. 2024; 29(1):6-16.

PMID: 39422162 PMC: 11730771. DOI: 10.1111/hdi.13187.


Exploring co-dispensed drug use in patients on sevelamer or polystyrene sulfonate to identify potential novel binding interactions: a cross sectional in silico study : Potential novel binding interactions with resins.

van Berlo-van de Laar I, Prins-Can I, Schuiling-Veninga C, Taxis K, Jansman F Int J Clin Pharm. 2021; 44(2):389-398.

PMID: 34850339 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-021-01355-7.


Binding interactions with sevelamer and polystyrene sulfonate in vitro.

van Berlo-van de Laar I, Prins-Can I, de Lange A, Taxis K, Jansman F Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021; 9(4):e00834.

PMID: 34302439 PMC: 8305432. DOI: 10.1002/prp2.834.


Intestinal Chelators, Sorbants, and Gut-Derived Uremic Toxins.

Laville S, Massy Z, Kamel S, Chillon J, Choukroun G, Liabeuf S Toxins (Basel). 2021; 13(2).

PMID: 33530404 PMC: 7911578. DOI: 10.3390/toxins13020091.


Phosphate binders for preventing and treating chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD).

Ruospo M, Palmer S, Natale P, Craig J, Vecchio M, Elder G Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 8:CD006023.

PMID: 30132304 PMC: 6513594. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006023.pub3.