» Articles » PMID: 27431590

Wingbeat Kinematics and Energetics During Weightlifting in Hovering Hummingbirds Across an Elevational Gradient

Overview
Date 2016 Jul 20
PMID 27431590
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hummingbirds differentially modify flight kinematics in response to the type of challenge imposed. Weightlifting is associated with increases in stroke amplitude (the angle swept by the wings) to increase the angular velocity of the wings and generate the requisite lift, but only up to 160°. Conversely, flight in hypodense air is accomplished by increasing the angular velocity of the wing through increases in wingbeat frequency and stroke amplitudes, with larger increases in amplitude than seen in weightlifting flight. The kinematic differences between these two challenges may be facilitated by the lower energetic costs associated with overcoming drag and inertial forces over the wing during hypodense flight. Thus, we hypothesized that energetic expenditure is what limits the kinematics of weightlifting flight, with lower air densities permitting increases in angular velocity at comparatively lower costs. To explore the kinematic and energetic effects of air density and weightlifting on hovering flight performance, video and respirometric recordings of weightlifting were performed on four species of hummingbirds across an elevational gradient. Contrary to our hypothesis, wingbeat frequency did not vary due to elevation. Instead, wingbeat frequency seems to increase depending on the power requirements for sustaining hovering flight. Furthermore, metabolic rates during hovering increased with angular velocity alone, independent of elevation. Thus, it appears that the differential responses to flight challenges are not driven by variation in the flight media.

Citing Articles

Universal wing- and fin-beat frequency scaling.

Jensen J, Dyre J, Hecksher T PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0303834.

PMID: 38837960 PMC: 11152310. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303834.


Integrating morphology and kinematics in the scaling of hummingbird hovering metabolic rate and efficiency.

Groom D, Toledo M, Powers D, Tobalske B, Welch Jr K Proc Biol Sci. 2018; 285(1873).

PMID: 29491168 PMC: 5832699. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2011.


The biomechanical origin of extreme wing allometry in hummingbirds.

Skandalis D, Segre P, Bahlman J, Groom D, Welch Jr K, Witt C Nat Commun. 2017; 8(1):1047.

PMID: 29051535 PMC: 5715027. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01223-x.

References
1.
Vance J, Williams J, Elekonich M, Roberts S . The effects of age and behavioral development on honey bee (Apis mellifera) flight performance. J Exp Biol. 2009; 212(Pt 16):2604-11. PMC: 2726856. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.028100. View

2.
Mahalingam S, Welch Jr K . Neuromuscular control of hovering wingbeat kinematics in response to distinct flight challenges in the ruby-throated hummingbird, Archilochus colubris. J Exp Biol. 2013; 216(Pt 22):4161-71. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.089383. View

3.
Altshuler D, Dickson W, Vance J, Roberts S, Dickinson M . Short-amplitude high-frequency wing strokes determine the aerodynamics of honeybee flight. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(50):18213-8. PMC: 1312389. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506590102. View

4.
Altshuler D, Dudley R, McGuire J . Resolution of a paradox: hummingbird flight at high elevation does not come without a cost. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(51):17731-6. PMC: 539726. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0405260101. View

5.
Vance J, Altshuler D, Dickson W, Dickinson M, Roberts S . Hovering flight in the honeybee Apis mellifera: kinematic mechanisms for varying aerodynamic forces. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2014; 87(6):870-81. DOI: 10.1086/678955. View