» Articles » PMID: 27423599

Increased Pulsatile Intracranial Pressure in Patients with Symptomatic Pineal Cysts and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers Indicative of Central Venous Hypertension

Overview
Journal J Neurol Sci
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Neurology
Date 2016 Jul 18
PMID 27423599
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In symptomatic individuals with non-hydrocephalic pineal cysts (PCs), it remains controversial what causes the symptoms. Based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers, we proposed that PC-associated crowding of the pineal recess may cause central venous hypertension. The aim of this study was to compare pulsatile and static ICP in patients with PCs and chronic daily headache (CDH), and compare ICP data in PC patients with the previously identified MRI biomarkers.

Methods: All patients assessed with over-night ICP monitoring for PCs or CDH who had been ruled out for idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema (IIHWOP) were retrieved from the database. The symptoms as well as the pulsatile and static ICP scores were compared between the PC and CDH patients, and ICP scores were compared with the MRI biomarkers indicative of central venous hypertension.

Results: The pulsatile ICP was significantly increased in the symptomatic patients with non-hydrocephalic PCs as compared to the CDH patients. Pulsatile ICP was significantly increased in the individuals with PC-grades 3-4, who had MRI biomarkers indicative of central venous hypertension. The tectum-splenium-cyst ratio correlated positively with pulsatile ICP and an index of thalamic edema.

Conclusions: Pulsatile ICP is increased in symptomatic patients with PCs and imaging evidence of central venous hypertension, supporting the hypothesis that PC-induced crowding of the pineal recess and venous obstruction may cause a central venous hypertension syndrome.

Citing Articles

Comparison of surgical approaches and outcome for symptomatic pineal cysts: microscopic/endoscopic fenestration vs. stereotactic catheter implantation.

Schmutzer-Sondergeld M, Gencer A, Schmidlechner T, Zimmermann H, Niedermeyer S, Katzendobler S Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025; 167(1):27.

PMID: 39888450 PMC: 11785698. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-025-06445-3.


The role of MRI biomarkers in evaluation of symptomatic pineal cysts - a retrospective analysis.

Greisert S, Fleck S, Rathmann E, Vollmer M, Schroeder H Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024; 166(1):323.

PMID: 39096400 PMC: 11297902. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-06212-w.


Physiological alterations of pineal recess crowding in symptomatic non-hydrocephalic pineal cysts.

Eide P, Lindstrom E, Pripp A, Valnes L, Ringstad G Brain Commun. 2023; 5(2):fcad078.

PMID: 37501910 PMC: 10371044. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad078.


Paediatric pineal region cysts: enigma or impaired neurofluid system?.

Ludwig H, Dreha-Kulaczewski S, Bock H Childs Nerv Syst. 2023; 39(12):3457-3466.

PMID: 37261536 PMC: 10684616. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-023-06000-4.


Does deep cerebral venous engorgement contribute to non-hydrocephalic pineal cysts becoming symptomatic? Some missing links.

Santarius T, Pickard J Brain Commun. 2023; 5(2):fcad096.

PMID: 37065089 PMC: 10090880. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad096.