» Articles » PMID: 27413708

Assessing the Shift of Radiobiological Metrics in Lung Radiotherapy Plans Using 2D Gamma Index

Overview
Date 2016 Jul 15
PMID 27413708
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of this work is to investigate the 2D gamma (γ) maps to illustrate the change of radiobiological outcomes for lung radiotherapy plans and evaluate the correlation between tumor control probability (TCP), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) with γ passing rates (γ-rates).

Methods: Nine patients with lung cancer were used. The doses were calculated using Modified Batho method integrated with pencil beam convolution (MB-PBC) and anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) using the same beam arrangements and prescription dose. The TCP and NTCP were estimated, respectively, using equivalent uniform dose (EUD) model and Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model. The correlation between ΔTCP or ΔNTCP with γ-rates, from 2%/2 and 3%/3 mm, were tested to explore the best correlation predicting the relevant γ criteria using Spearman's rank test (ρ). Wilcoxon paired test was used to calculate P value.

Results: TCP value was significantly lower in the recalculated AAA plans as compared to MB plans. However, AAA predicted more NTCP on lung pneumonitis according to the LKB model and using relevant radiobiological parameters (n, m and TD50) for MB-PBC and AAA, with P=0.03. The data showed a weak correlation between radiobiological metrics with γ-rates or γ-mean, ρ<0.3.

Conclusions: AAA and MB yield different TCP values as well as NTCP for lung pneumonitis based on the LKB model parameters. Therefore, 2D γ-maps, generated with 2%/2 or 3%/3 mm, could illustrate visual information about the radiobiological changes. The information is useful to evaluate the clinical outcome of a radiotherapy treatment and to approve the treatment plan of the patient if the dose constraints are respected. On the other hand, the γ-maps tool can be used as quality assurance (QA) process to check the predicted TCP and NTCP from radiobiological models.

Citing Articles

Gamma Index Analysis as a Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Tool for High-Precision Radiotherapy: A Clinical Perspective of Single Institute Experience.

Das S, Kharade V, Pandey V, Kv A, Pasricha R, Gupta M Cureus. 2022; 14(10):e30885.

PMID: 36337776 PMC: 9626372. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30885.


Evaluation and Performance of ArcCheck and Film using Gamma Criteria in Pre-treatment Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy.

Ramachandran P, Tajaldeen A, Taylor D, Wanigaratne D, Roozen K, Geso M J Med Phys. 2018; 42(4):251-257.

PMID: 29296040 PMC: 5744454. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_132_16.


Agreement between gamma passing rates using computed tomography in radiotherapy and secondary cancer risk prediction from more advanced dose calculated models.

Chaikh A, Balosso J Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2017; 7(3):292-298.

PMID: 28811995 PMC: 5537131. DOI: 10.21037/qims.2017.06.03.


Statistic and dosimetric criteria to assess the shift of the prescribed dose for lung radiotherapy plans when integrating point kernel models in medical physics: are we ready?.

Chaikh A, Balosso J Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2017; 5(6):681-687.

PMID: 28149762 PMC: 5233876. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2016.11.03.


Impact of dose calculation models on radiotherapy outcomes and quality adjusted life years for lung cancer treatment: do we need to measure radiotherapy outcomes to tune the radiobiological parameters of a normal tissue complication probability....

Chaikh A, Docquiere N, Bondiau P, Balosso J Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2017; 5(6):673-680.

PMID: 28149761 PMC: 5233866. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2016.11.04.

References
1.
Bentzen S, Tucker S . Quantifying the position and steepness of radiation dose-response curves. Int J Radiat Biol. 1997; 71(5):531-42. DOI: 10.1080/095530097143860. View

2.
Webb S, Nahum A . A model for calculating tumour control probability in radiotherapy including the effects of inhomogeneous distributions of dose and clonogenic cell density. Phys Med Biol. 1993; 38(6):653-66. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/38/6/001. View

3.
Kutcher G, Burman C, Brewster L, Goitein M, Mohan R . Histogram reduction method for calculating complication probabilities for three-dimensional treatment planning evaluations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991; 21(1):137-46. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90173-2. View

4.
Tucker S, Taylor J . Improved models of tumour cure. Int J Radiat Biol. 1996; 70(5):539-53. DOI: 10.1080/095530096144743. View

5.
Sumida I, Yamaguchi H, Kizaki H, Aboshi K, Tsujii M, Yoshikawa N . Novel Radiobiological Gamma Index for Evaluation of 3-Dimensional Predicted Dose Distribution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015; 92(4):779-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.02.041. View