» Articles » PMID: 27405615

Neural Response to Pictorial Health Warning Labels Can Predict Smoking Behavioral Change

Overview
Date 2016 Jul 14
PMID 27405615
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In order to improve our understanding of how pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) influence smoking behavior, we examined whether brain activity helps to explain smoking behavior above and beyond self-reported effectiveness of HWLs. We measured the neural response in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and the amygdala while adult smokers viewed HWLs. Two weeks later, participants' self-reported smoking behavior and biomarkers of smoking behavior were reassessed. We compared multiple models predicting change in self-reported smoking behavior (cigarettes per day [CPD]) and change in a biomarkers of smoke exposure (expired carbon monoxide [CO]). Brain activity in the vmPFC and amygdala not only predicted changes in CO, but also accounted for outcome variance above and beyond self-report data. Neural data were most useful in predicting behavioral change as quantified by the objective biomarker (CO). This pattern of activity was significantly modulated by individuals' intention to quit. The finding that both cognitive (vmPFC) and affective (amygdala) brain areas contributed to these models supports the idea that smokers respond to HWLs in a cognitive-affective manner. Based on our findings, researchers may wish to consider using neural data from both cognitive and affective networks when attempting to predict behavioral change in certain populations (e.g. cigarette smokers).

Citing Articles

Gain/loss framing moderates the VMPFC's response to persuasive messages when behaviors have personal outcomes.

Minich M, Chang C, Kriss L, Tveleneva A, Cascio C Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023; 18(1).

PMID: 37952097 PMC: 10686349. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsad069.


Brain system integration and message consistent health behavior change.

Jovanova M, Falk E, Pearl J, Pandey P, Brook ODonnell M, Kang Y Health Psychol. 2022; 41(9):611-620.

PMID: 36006700 PMC: 10152515. DOI: 10.1037/hea0001201.


Cognitive and emotional responses to pictorial warning labels and their association with quitting measures after continued exposure.

Sidhu A, Johnson A, Souprountchouk V, Wackowski O, Strasser A, Mercincavage M Addict Behav. 2021; 124:107121.

PMID: 34583271 PMC: 8603253. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107121.


Social networks and neural receptivity to persuasive health messages.

Pandey P, Kang Y, Cooper N, ODonnell M, Falk E Health Psychol. 2021; 40(4):285-294.

PMID: 33856834 PMC: 8445070. DOI: 10.1037/hea0001059.


The Effectiveness of Online Messages for Promoting Smoking Cessation Resources: Predicting Nationwide Campaign Effects From Neural Responses in the EX Campaign.

Schmalzle R, Cooper N, Brook ODonnell M, Tompson S, Lee S, Cantrell J Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 14:565772.

PMID: 33100997 PMC: 7546826. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.565772.


References
1.
Falk E, Way B, Jasinska A . An imaging genetics approach to understanding social influence. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012; 6:168. PMC: 3373206. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00168. View

2.
Podsakoff P, Mackenzie S, Lee J, Podsakoff N . Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003; 88(5):879-903. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879. View

3.
. Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2002; 4(2):149-59. DOI: 10.1080/14622200210123581. View

4.
Rubinstein M . Scanning the brain for answers about effectiveness of graphic warning labels. Tob Control. 2015; 24(3):211-2. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052205. View

5.
Frankenstein W, Wilson G . Alcohol's effects on self-awareness. Addict Behav. 1984; 9(4):323-8. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4603(84)90030-3. View