» Articles » PMID: 27403927

The Long-Term Outcome of Boys With Partial Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome and a Mutation in the Androgen Receptor Gene

Abstract

Background: In boys with suspected partial androgen insensitivity syndrome (PAIS), systematic evidence that supports the long-term prognostic value of identifying a mutation in the androgen receptor gene (AR) is lacking.

Objective: To assess the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes in young men with suspected PAIS in relation to the results of AR analysis.

Methods: Through the International Disorders of Sex Development Registry, clinical information was gathered on young men suspected of having PAIS (n = 52) who presented before the age of 16 years and had genetic analysis of AR.

Results: The median ages at presentation and at the time of the study were 1 month (range, 1 day to 16 years) and 22 years (range, 16 to 52 years), respectively. Of the cohort, 29 men (56%) had 20 different AR mutations reported. At diagnosis, the median external masculinization scores were 7 and 6 in cases with and without AR mutation, respectively (P = .9), and median current external masculinization scores were 9 and 10, respectively (P = .28). Thirty-five men (67%) required at least one surgical procedure, and those with a mutation were more likely to require multiple surgeries for hypospadias (P = .004). All cases with an AR mutation had gynecomastia, compared to 9% of those without an AR mutation. Of the six men who had a mastectomy, five (83%) had an AR mutation.

Conclusions: Boys with genetically confirmed PAIS are likely to have a poorer clinical outcome than those with XY DSD, with normal T synthesis, and without an identifiable AR mutation. Routine genetic analysis of AR to confirm PAIS informs long-term prognosis and management.

Citing Articles

Sex Assignment in Cases of Ambiguous Genitalia.

Mohammed H, Ansari N, Baig A, Alshowaikhat J, Uz Zama M, Hussain Timraz J Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e74730.

PMID: 39735144 PMC: 11682607. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74730.


Role of Gene Mutations in Disorders of Sex Development: Molecular and Clinical Features.

Luppino G, Wasniewska M, Coco R, Pepe G, Morabito L, Li Pomi A Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024; 46(5):4519-4532.

PMID: 38785542 PMC: 11119465. DOI: 10.3390/cimb46050274.


Clinical and genetic characteristics of a large international cohort of individuals with rare NR5A1/SF-1 variants of sex development.

Kouri C, Sommer G, Martinez de Lapiscina I, Elzenaty R, Tack L, Cools M EBioMedicine. 2024; 99:104941.

PMID: 38168586 PMC: 10797150. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104941.


Predictors of surgical complications in boys with hypospadias: data from an internationa registry.

Scougall K, Bryce J, Baronio F, Boal R, Castera J, Castro S World J Pediatr Surg. 2023; 6(4):e000599.

PMID: 37860275 PMC: 10582860. DOI: 10.1136/wjps-2023-000599.


Androgen insensitivity syndrome: a review.

Delli Paoli E, Di Chiano S, Paoli D, Lenzi A, Lombardo F, Pallotti F J Endocrinol Invest. 2023; 46(11):2237-2245.

PMID: 37300628 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-023-02127-y.


References
1.
Danilovic D, Correa P, Costa E, Melo K, Mendonca B, Arnhold I . Height and bone mineral density in androgen insensitivity syndrome with mutations in the androgen receptor gene. Osteoporos Int. 2006; 18(3):369-74. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0243-6. View

2.
Brinkmann A . Molecular basis of androgen insensitivity. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001; 179(1-2):105-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0303-7207(01)00466-x. View

3.
Kalfa N, Philibert P, Werner R, Audran F, Bashamboo A, Lehors H . Minor hypospadias: the "tip of the iceberg" of the partial androgen insensitivity syndrome. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e61824. PMC: 3640041. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061824. View

4.
Deeb A, Mason C, Lee Y, Hughes I . Correlation between genotype, phenotype and sex of rearing in 111 patients with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005; 63(1):56-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02298.x. View

5.
Ahmed S, Rodie M, Jiang J, Sinnott R . The European disorder of sex development registry: a virtual research environment. Sex Dev. 2010; 4(4-5):192-8. DOI: 10.1159/000313434. View