» Articles » PMID: 27402418

Influence of Implant Abutment Material on the Color of Different Ceramic Crown Systems

Overview
Journal J Prosthet Dent
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2016 Jul 13
PMID 27402418
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Statement Of Problem: Ceramics are widely used for anterior restorations; however, clinical color reproduction still constitutes a challenge particularly when the ceramic crowns are used on titanium implant abutments.

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of implant abutment material on the color of different ceramic material systems.

Material And Methods: Forty disks (11×1.5 mm, shade A2) were fabricated from medium-opacity (mo) and high-translucency (ht) lithium disilicate (IPS e.max) blocks, an aluminous ceramic (VITA In-Ceram Alumina), and a zirconia (Zirkonzahn) ceramic system. Disks were fabricated to represent 3 different implant abutments (zirconia, gold-palladium, and titanium) and dentin (composite resin, A2 shade) as background (11×2 mm). Disk-shaped composite resin specimens in A2 shade were fabricated to represent the cement layer. The color measurements of ceramic specimens were made on composite resin abutment materials using a spectrophotometer. CIELab color coordinates were recorded, and the color coordinates measured on composite resin background served as the control group. Color differences (ΔE) between the control and test groups were calculated. The data were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and compared with the Tukey HSD test (α=.05).

Results: The ceramics system, abutment material, and their interaction were significant for ΔE values (P<.001). Clinically unacceptable results (ΔE>2.25) were observed for lithium disilicate ceramics on titanium abutments (2.46-2.50). The ΔE values of lithium disilicate ceramics for gold-palladium and titanium abutments were significantly higher than for other groups (P<.05).

Conclusion: The color results (ΔE>2.25) of an implant-supported lithium disilicate ceramic restoration may be clinically unacceptable if it is fabricated over a titanium abutment. Zirconia may be a more suitable abutment material for implant-supported ceramic restorations.

Citing Articles

Impact of Substrate Material, Esthetic Material Thickness, and Cement on Color Reproduction in Implant-Supported Fixed Restorations.

Oancea L, Cristache C, Macris A Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71227.

PMID: 39525194 PMC: 11550146. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71227.


Masking ability of computer-aided design and manufacturing bleach shade ceramics with different thicknesses on titanium abutments.

Bidaki A, Ahmadizenouz G, Esmaeili B Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024; 21:51.

PMID: 39512580 PMC: 11542750.


In Vitro Effect of Anodization of Titanium Abutments on Color Parameters and Color Difference of Lithium Disilicate All-Ceramic Crowns.

Khorshidi S, Zarbakhsh A, Lawaf S, Golalipour S, Sayyari M, Mahmoudi Nahavandi A Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024; 10(5):e70002.

PMID: 39295316 PMC: 11411144. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.70002.


The impact of various substrates, ceramic shades, and brands on the ultimate color and masking capacity of highly translucent monolithic zirconia: an in vitro study.

Ansarifard E, Taghva M, Mosaddad S, Akhlaghian M Odontology. 2024; .

PMID: 39222097 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-024-00996-0.


Effect of cement type, luting protocol, and ceramic abutment material on the shade of cemented titanium-based lithium disilicate crowns and surrounding peri-implant soft tissue: a spectrophotometric analysis.

Gehrke P, Pietruska M, Ladewig J, Fischer C, Sader R, Weigl P J Adv Prosthodont. 2024; 16(4):231-243.

PMID: 39221417 PMC: 11361822. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.4.231.