» Articles » PMID: 27402403

Challenges of Development and Implementation of Point of Care Pharmacogenetic Testing

Overview
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2016 Jul 13
PMID 27402403
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Just as technology was the underlying driver of the sequencing of the human genome and subsequent generation of volumes of genome sequence data from healthy and affected individuals, animal, plant, and microbial species alike, so too will technology revolutionize diagnostic testing. One area of intense interest is the use of genetic data to inform decisions regarding drug selection and drug dosing, known as pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing, to improve likelihood of successful treatment outcomes with minimal risks.

Areas Covered: This commentary will provide an overview of implementation research of PGx testing, the benefits of point-of-care (POC) testing and overview of POC testing platforms, available PGx tests, and barriers and facilitators to the development and integration of POC-PGx testing into clinical settings. Sources include the published literature, and databases from the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, Food and Drug Administration. Expert commentary: The utilization of POC PGx testing may enable more routine test use, but the development and implementation of such tests will face some barriers before personalized medicine is available to every patient. In particular, provider training, availability of clinical decision supports, and connectivity will be key areas to facilitate routine use.

Citing Articles

Accuracy and technical characteristics of CYP2C19 point of care tests: a systematic review.

Tomlinson E, Cooper C, Jones H, Manzano C, Palmer R, Carroll J Pharmacogenomics. 2024; 25(8-9):407-423.

PMID: 39229818 PMC: 11418221. DOI: 10.1080/14622416.2024.2392479.


Genotyping of Patients with Adverse Drug Reaction or Therapy Failure: Database Analysis of a Pharmacogenetics Case Series Study.

Bollinger A, Stauble C, Jeiziner C, Wiss F, Hersberger K, Lampert M Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2023; 16:693-706.

PMID: 37426898 PMC: 10327911. DOI: 10.2147/PGPM.S415259.


Analyzing SDG interlinkages: identifying trade-offs and synergies for a responsible innovation.

Luttikhuis N, Wiebe K Sustain Sci. 2023; :1-19.

PMID: 37363308 PMC: 10214325. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-023-01336-x.


Advances in point-of-care genetic testing for personalized medicine applications.

de Olazarra A, Wang S Biomicrofluidics. 2023; 17(3):031501.

PMID: 37159750 PMC: 10163839. DOI: 10.1063/5.0143311.


Three Grand Challenges in High Throughput Omics Technologies.

Suravajhala P, Goltsov A Biomolecules. 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 36139077 PMC: 9496467. DOI: 10.3390/biom12091238.


References
1.
Dyer K, NICHOLS J, Taylor M, Miller R, Saltz J . Development of a universal connectivity and data management system. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2002; 24(1):25-38; quiz 2 p following 75. DOI: 10.1097/00002727-200105000-00006. View

2.
Higashi M, Veenstra D, Kondo L, Wittkowsky A, Srinouanprachanh S, Farin F . Association between CYP2C9 genetic variants and anticoagulation-related outcomes during warfarin therapy. JAMA. 2002; 287(13):1690-8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.13.1690. View

3.
Kavsak P, Zielinski N, Li D, McNamara P, Adeli K . Challenges of implementing point-of-care testing (POCT) glucose meters in a pediatric acute care setting. Clin Biochem. 2004; 37(9):811-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.06.003. View

4.
Rieder M, Reiner A, Gage B, Nickerson D, Eby C, McLeod H . Effect of VKORC1 haplotypes on transcriptional regulation and warfarin dose. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(22):2285-93. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa044503. View

5.
Meier F, Jones B . Point-of-care testing error: sources and amplifiers, taxonomy, prevention strategies, and detection monitors. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005; 129(10):1262-7. DOI: 10.5858/2005-129-1262-PTESAA. View