» Articles » PMID: 27400851

Injectables in the Nose: Facts and Controversies

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2016 Jul 13
PMID 27400851
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nasal injectables and surface treatments alter the appearance of the nose both primarily and following nasal surgery. Fillers such as hyaluronic acids, calcium hydroxyapatite, and fat have a variety of advantages and disadvantages in eliminating small asymmetries postrhinoplasty. All nasal injectables have rare but severe ocular and cerebral ischemic complications. The injection of steroids following nasal reconstruction has a role in preventing supratip swelling and can improve the appearance of grafts to the nose. Resurfacing techniques reduce the appearance of autotransplanted grafts to the nose; there is little controversy about their benefit but surgeon preference for timing is varied.

Citing Articles

Rhinofiller: Fat Grafting (Surgical) Versus Hyaluronic Acid (Non-Surgical).

Gentile P Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022; 47(2):702-713.

PMID: 36470985 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-022-03209-7.


Safety and Early Satisfaction Assessment of Patients Seeking Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty with Filler.

Rauso R, Colella G, Zerbinati N, Salti G J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2018; 10(4):207-214.

PMID: 29491656 PMC: 5820838. DOI: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_89_17.