» Articles » PMID: 27388885

Inaccuracy of Urine Output Measurements Due to Urinary Retention in Catheterized Patients in the Burn ICU

Overview
Journal J Burn Care Res
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2016 Jul 9
PMID 27388885
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electronic urinary output monitors, intended to provide urine output information to guide fluid therapy during burn resuscitation, can be inaccurate because of airlocks causing urine retention in the drainage tube and bladder. In this study, the authors explore the effects of airlock formation on urine output measured using an electronic urinary output monitor connected to either a standard commercial drainage tubing system or a drainage tubing system with an automated airlock clearing mechanism. In a multicenter study in the burn intensive care unit, urine output was compared between 10 control patients with a standard commercial drainage tubing system and 10 test patients with a novel automated airlock clearing drainage tubing system. The comparison was focused on identifying the number and magnitude of surges in urinary output because of airlocks and associated periods of false oliguria. In the control group, 5 of 10 (50%) patients had drainage line flow impediments from 8 airlocks. In addition, control patients experienced six associated periods of false oliguria. Airlock surge volumes ranged from 50 to 329 ml, and false oliguria duration ranged from 39.4 to 185.2 minutes. In the test group, 0 of 10 (0%) patients had drainage line impediments from airlocks (P < .01), and hence, there were no periods of false oliguria. Airlocks and associated periods of false oliguria occur with standard commercial drainage tubing and are eliminated using an automated airlock clearing drainage tube. Electronic urinary output monitoring with self-clearing drainage has the potential to improve tracking of real-time urine output and decrease caregiver workload.

Citing Articles

A Large-Scale Multicenter Retrospective Study on Nephrotoxicity Associated With Empiric Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients.

Chen A, Deng C, Calvachi-Prieto P, Armengol de la Hoz M, Khazi-Syed A, Chen C Chest. 2023; 164(2):355-368.

PMID: 37040818 PMC: 10475819. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.03.046.


A Retrospective, Observational Study of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Events Post-Implementation of a Novel Urinary Catheter System with Active Drain Line Clearance and Automated Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring.

Brockway P, Hill D, Moll V, Stanton K, Malbrain M, Velamuri S Life (Basel). 2022; 12(12).

PMID: 36556315 PMC: 9782014. DOI: 10.3390/life12121950.


Intra-abdominal hypertension in cardiac surgery patients: a multicenter observational sub-study of the Accuryn registry.

Khanna A, Minear S, Kurz A, Moll V, Stanton K, Essakalli L J Clin Monit Comput. 2022; 37(1):189-199.

PMID: 35695943 PMC: 9852117. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00878-2.


Continuous Monitoring of Intra-abdominal Pressure in Severe Acute Pancreatitis Leads to Early Detection of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: A Case Report.

Akiode O, Moll V, Schears G Cureus. 2022; 14(4):e24606.

PMID: 35509753 PMC: 9057312. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24606.


Association of Oliguria With Acute Kidney Injury Diagnosis, Severity Assessment, and Mortality Among Patients With Critical Illness.

Bianchi N, Stavart L, Altarelli M, Kelevina T, Faouzi M, Schneider A JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(11):e2133094.

PMID: 34735011 PMC: 8569487. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33094.


References
1.
Wlodzimirow K, Abu-Hanna A, Slabbekoorn M, Chamuleau R, Schultz M, Bouman C . A comparison of RIFLE with and without urine output criteria for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2012; 16(5):R200. PMC: 3682302. DOI: 10.1186/cc11808. View

2.
Prowle J, Liu Y, Licari E, Bagshaw S, Egi M, Haase M . Oliguria as predictive biomarker of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2011; 15(4):R172. PMC: 3387614. DOI: 10.1186/cc10318. View

3.
Glahn B, Braendstrup O, Olesen H . Influence of drainage conditions on mucosal bladder damage by indwelling catheters. II. Histological study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1988; 22(2):93-9. DOI: 10.1080/00365599.1988.11690392. View

4.
ISAACS J, McWhorter D . Foley catheter drainage systems and bladder damage. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1971; 132(5):889-91. View

5.
Garcia M, Gulati S, Liepmann D, Stackhouse G, Greene K, Stoller M . Traditional Foley drainage systems--do they drain the bladder?. J Urol. 2006; 177(1):203-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.101. View