» Articles » PMID: 27386061

Efficiency and Outcome of Non-invasive Versus Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Therapy in Respiratory Failure Due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Jul 8
PMID 27386061
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Application noninvasive ventilation in the patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) reduced mortality. This case-control study was designed to compare efficiency and outcome of non-invasive (NIV) versus invasive positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) in respiratory failure due to COPD.

Methods: The patients were assigned to NIV or IPPV intermittantly.The clinical parameters, including RR (respiratory rate), BP (blood pressure), HR (heart rate) and PH, PaCO2, PaO2 before and 1, 4 and 24 h after treatment were measured. Demographic information such as age, sex, severity of disease based on APACHE score, length of stay and outcome were recorded.

Results: Fifty patients were enrolled in the NIV group and 50 patients in IPPV. The mean age was 70.5 in NIV and 63.9 in invasive ventilation group (p>0.05). In IPPV group, the average values of PH: PCO2: and PO2, were 7.22±0.11, 69.64 + 24.25: and 68.86±24.41 .In NIV, the respective values were 7.30±0.07, 83.94±18.95, and 60.60±19.88. In NIV group, after 1, 4 and 24 h treatment, the clinical and ventilation parameters were stable. The mean APACHE score in was IPPV, 26.46±5.45 and in NIV was 12.26±5.54 (p<0.05). The average length of hospital stay in IPPV was 15.90±10 and in NIV 8.12±6.49 days (p<0.05). The total mortality in the NIV was 4 (8%) and in IPPV, 27 patients (54%) (p<0.05).

Conclusion: This study indicates that using NIPPV is a useful therapeutic mode of treatment for respiratory failure with acceptable success rate and lower mortality. The application of NIPPV reduces hospital stay, intubation and its consequent complications.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness and Outcomes of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients With Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Gudelli M, K S, Kalathil P, Pimple O, Shahid A, Chandradas N Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e62746.

PMID: 39036269 PMC: 11259907. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62746.


Influencing factors of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure: a 10-year study in one single center.

Wang J, Bian S, Tang X, Ye S, Meng S, Lei W Eur J Med Res. 2021; 26(1):136.

PMID: 34861893 PMC: 8641230. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-021-00615-6.


Prospective Comparative Evaluation of Noninvasive and Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Patients of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Acute Respiratory Failure Type II.

Sohal A, Anand A, Kaur P, Kaur H, Attri J Anesth Essays Res. 2021; 15(1):8-13.

PMID: 34667341 PMC: 8462414. DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_53_21.


Completeness of the operating room to intensive care unit handover: a matter of time?.

Dusse F, Putz J, Bohmer A, Schieren M, Joppich R, Wappler F BMC Anesthesiol. 2021; 21(1):38.

PMID: 33546588 PMC: 7863365. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01247-3.


Effects of dexmedetomidine on oxidative stress and inflammatory response in lungs during mechanical ventilation in COPD rats.

Li P, Han J, Zhang D, Cao S, Su C Exp Ther Med. 2020; 19(2):1219-1224.

PMID: 32010292 PMC: 6966231. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.8341.


References
1.
Peter J, Moran J, Phillips-Hughes J, Warn D . Noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure--a meta-analysis update. Crit Care Med. 2002; 30(3):555-62. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200203000-00010. View

2.
Singh V, Khanna P, Rao B, Sharma S, Gupta R . Outcome predictors for non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure. J Assoc Physicians India. 2006; 54:361-5. View

3.
Antonelli M, Conti G, Rocco M, Bufi M, De Blasi R, Vivino G . A comparison of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339(7):429-35. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199808133390703. View

4.
Vezzani A, Brusasco C, Palermo S, Launo C, Mergoni M, Corradi F . Ultrasound localization of central vein catheter and detection of postprocedural pneumothorax: an alternative to chest radiography. Crit Care Med. 2009; 38(2):533-8. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c0328f. View

5.
Thomsen M, Dahl M, Lange P, Vestbo J, Nordestgaard B . Inflammatory biomarkers and comorbidities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012; 186(10):982-8. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201206-1113OC. View