Comparison of Automated Brain Volumetry Methods with Stereology in Children Aged 2 to 3 years

Overview

Journal Neuroradiology

Specialties Neurology
Radiology

Date 2016 Jul 6

PMID 27380040

Citations 7

Authors

Kristina N Mayer

Beatrice Latal

Walter Knirsch

Ianina Scheer

Michael von Rhein

Bettina Reich

Jurgen Bauer

Kerstin Gummel

Neil Roberts

Ruth OGorman Tuura

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: The accurate and precise measurement of brain volumes in young children is important for early identification of children with reduced brain volumes and an increased risk for neurodevelopmental impairment. Brain volumes can be measured from cerebral MRI (cMRI), but most neuroimaging tools used for cerebral segmentation and volumetry were developed for use in adults and have not been validated in infants or young children. Here, we investigate the feasibility and accuracy of three automated software methods (i.e., SPM, FSL, and FreeSurfer) for brain volumetry in young children and compare the measures with corresponding volumes obtained using the Cavalieri method of modern design stereology.

Methods: Cerebral MRI data were collected from 21 children with a complex congenital heart disease (CHD) before Fontan procedure, at a median age of 27 months (range 20.9-42.4 months). Data were segmented with SPM, FSL, and FreeSurfer, and total intracranial volume (ICV) and total brain volume (TBV) were compared with corresponding measures obtained using the Cavalieri method.

Results: Agreement between the estimated brain volumes (ICV and TBV) relative to the gold standard stereological volumes was strongest for FreeSurfer (p < 0.001) and moderate for SPM segment (ICV p = 0.05; TBV p = 0.006). No significant association was evident between ICV and TBV obtained using SPM NewSegment and FSL FAST and the corresponding stereological volumes.

Conclusions: FreeSurfer provides an accurate method for measuring brain volumes in young children, even in the presence of structural brain abnormalities.

Citing Articles

Structural deviations of the posterior fossa and the cerebellum and their cognitive links in a neurodevelopmental deletion syndrome.

Sefik E, Duan K, Li Y, Sholar B, Evans L, Pincus J Mol Psychiatry. 2024; 29(11):3395-3411.

PMID: 38744992 PMC: 11541222. DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02584-8.

Convolutional Neural Network for Fully Automated Cerebellar Volumetry in Children in Comparison to Manual Segmentation and Developmental Trajectory of Cerebellar Volumes.

Sobootian D, Bronzlik P, Spineli L, Becker L, Winther H, Bueltmann E Cerebellum. 2023; 23(3):1074-1085.

PMID: 37833550 PMC: 11102395. DOI: 10.1007/s12311-023-01609-2.

Comparative validation of AI and non-AI methods in MRI volumetry to diagnose Parkinsonian syndromes.

Song J, Hahm J, Lee J, Lim C, Chung M, Youn J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):3439.

PMID: 36859498 PMC: 10156821. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30381-w.

Postoperative brain volumes are associated with one-year neurodevelopmental outcome in children with severe congenital heart disease.

Meuwly E, Feldmann M, Knirsch W, von Rhein M, Payette K, Dave H Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):10885.

PMID: 31350426 PMC: 6659678. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-47328-9.

Neurodevelopmental outcome in hypoplastic left heart syndrome after hybrid procedure.

Reich B, Heye K, Wetterling K, Logeswaran T, Hahn A, Akinturk H Transl Pediatr. 2019; 8(2):94-106.

PMID: 31161076 PMC: 6514277. DOI: 10.21037/tp.2019.04.05.

References

Smith S, Jenkinson M, Woolrich M, Beckmann C, Behrens T, Johansen-Berg H . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage. 2004; 23 Suppl 1:S208-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051. View

Salmenpera T, Kononen M, Roberts N, Vanninen R, Pitkanen A, Kalviainen R . Hippocampal damage in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: a prospective MRI study. Neurology. 2005; 64(1):62-8. DOI: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000148643.36513.2A. View

Roberts N, Puddephat M, McNulty V . The benefit of stereology for quantitative radiology. Br J Radiol. 2000; 73(871):679-97. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.73.871.11089458. View

Segonne F, Pacheco J, Fischl B . Geometrically accurate topology-correction of cortical surfaces using nonseparating loops. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2007; 26(4):518-29. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2006.887364. View

Fischl B, Salat D, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C . Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron. 2002; 33(3):341-55. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x. View

Fischl B, Sereno M, Dale A . Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage. 1999; 9(2):195-207. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0396. View

Morey R, Petty C, Xu Y, Hayes J, Wagner 2nd H, Lewis D . A comparison of automated segmentation and manual tracing for quantifying hippocampal and amygdala volumes. Neuroimage. 2009; 45(3):855-66. PMC: 2714773. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.033. View

McQuillen P, Miller S . Congenital heart disease and brain development. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010; 1184:68-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05116.x. View

Sled J, Zijdenbos A, Evans A . A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998; 17(1):87-97. DOI: 10.1109/42.668698. View

10.

Ashburner J, Friston K . Multimodal image coregistration and partitioning--a unified framework. Neuroimage. 1997; 6(3):209-17. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1997.0290. View

11.

Keller S, Highley J, Garcia-Finana M, Sluming V, Rezaie R, Roberts N . Sulcal variability, stereological measurement and asymmetry of Broca's area on MR images. J Anat. 2007; 211(4):534-55. PMC: 2375829. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00793.x. View

12.

Heckemann R, Hajnal J, Aljabar P, Rueckert D, Hammers A . Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion. Neuroimage. 2006; 33(1):115-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.061. View

13.

Furlong C, Garcia-Finana M, Puddephat M, Anderson A, Fabricius K, Eriksen N . Application of stereological methods to estimate post-mortem brain surface area using 3T MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 31(3):456-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.09.001. View

14.

Keller S, Roberts N . Measurement of brain volume using MRI: software, techniques, choices and prerequisites. J Anthropol Sci. 2009; 87:127-51. View

15.

Keller S, Gerdes J, Mohammadi S, Kellinghaus C, Kugel H, Deppe K . Volume estimation of the thalamus using freesurfer and stereology: consistency between methods. Neuroinformatics. 2012; 10(4):341-50. PMC: 3464372. DOI: 10.1007/s12021-012-9147-0. View

16.

Gousias I, Rueckert D, Heckemann R, Dyet L, Boardman J, Edwards A . Automatic segmentation of brain MRIs of 2-year-olds into 83 regions of interest. Neuroimage. 2008; 40(2):672-684. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.034. View

17.

Klauschen F, Goldman A, Barra V, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Lundervold A . Evaluation of automated brain MR image segmentation and volumetry methods. Hum Brain Mapp. 2008; 30(4):1310-27. PMC: 6870639. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20599. View

18.

Mayhew T, Olsen D . Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and model-free estimates of brain volume determined using the Cavalieri principle. J Anat. 1991; 178:133-44. PMC: 1260542. View

19.

Dewey J, Hana G, Russell T, Price J, McCaffrey D, Harezlak J . Reliability and validity of MRI-based automated volumetry software relative to auto-assisted manual measurement of subcortical structures in HIV-infected patients from a multisite study. Neuroimage. 2010; 51(4):1334-44. PMC: 2884380. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.033. View

20.

Khalil A, Suff N, Thilaganathan B, Hurrell A, Cooper D, Carvalho J . Brain abnormalities and neurodevelopmental delay in congenital heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 43(1):14-24. DOI: 10.1002/uog.12526. View