» Articles » PMID: 27377609

The Evolving Field of Wound Measurement Techniques: A Literature Review

Overview
Journal Wounds
Date 2016 Jul 6
PMID 27377609
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Wound healing is a complex and multifactorial process that requires the involvement of a multidisciplinary approach. Methods of wound measurement have been developed and continually refined with the purpose of ensuring precision in wound measurement and documentation as the primary indicator of healing. This review aims to ascertain the efficacies of current wound area measurement techniques, and to highlight any perceived gaps in the literature so as to develop suggestions for future studies and practice.

Methods: Med- line, PubMed, CliniKey, and CINAHL were searched using the terms "wound/ulcer measurement techniques," "wound assessment," "digi- tal planimetry," and "structured light." Articles between 2000 and 2014 were selected, and secondary searches were carried out by exam- ining the references of relevant articles. Only papers written in English were included.

Results: A universal, standardized method of wound as- sessment has not been established or proposed. At present, techniques range from the simple to the more complex - most of which have char- acteristics that allow for applicability in both rural and urban settings. Techniques covered are: ruler measurements, acetate tracings/contact planimetry, digital planimetry, and structured light devices. Conclu- sion. In reviewing the literature, the precision and reliability of digital planimetry over the more conventional methods of ruler measurements and acetate tracings are consistently demonstrated. The advent and utility of the laser or structured light approach, however, is promising, has only been analyzed by a few, and opens up the scope for further evaluation of this technique.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of a Semi-Automated Wound-Halving Algorithm for Split-Wound Design Studies: A Step towards Enhanced Wound-Healing Assessment.

Georg P, Schmid M, Zahia S, Probst S, Cazzaniga S, Hunger R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(12).

PMID: 38930128 PMC: 11205086. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123599.


Measurement of perineal tears as an additional tool for laceration assessment during vaginal birth.

Urasaki M, Lima M, Goncalves R, Araujo N, Pereira C Eur J Midwifery. 2023; 7:43.

PMID: 38125555 PMC: 10731751. DOI: 10.18332/ejm/174310.


Determining the measurement accuracy in assessing the progress of wound healing.

Dolibog P, Dolibog P, Chmielewska D Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2023; 40(4):554-560.

PMID: 37692269 PMC: 10485759. DOI: 10.5114/ada.2023.129326.


Intralesional Infiltrations of Cell-Free Filtrates Derived from Human Diabetic Tissues Delay the Healing Process and Recreate Diabetes Histopathological Changes in Healthy Rats.

Berlanga-Acosta J, Fernandez-Mayola M, Mendoza-Mari Y, Garcia-Ojalvo A, Playford R, Guillen-Nieto G Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2023; 2:617741.

PMID: 36994347 PMC: 10012095. DOI: 10.3389/fcdhc.2021.617741.


Burn Wound Healing Effect of a Sterilized Traditional Formulation of vs. Silver Sulfadiazine Cream 1% in Patients Presenting Second-degree Burn Wounds: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.

Badr P, Afsharypuor S, Tohidinik H, Mohammadi A, Daneshamouz S Iran J Med Sci. 2023; 48(2):137-145.

PMID: 36895452 PMC: 9989234. DOI: 10.30476/IJMS.2022.91853.2307.