» Articles » PMID: 27375851

Perceptions of Pediatric Nephrologists Regarding Timing of Dialysis Initiation in Children in Canada

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2016 Jul 5
PMID 27375851
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Significant practice variation exists in Canada with respect to timing of dialysis initiation in children. In the absence of evidence to guide practice, physicians' perceptions may significantly influence decision-making.

Objective: The objectives of this study are to (1) evaluate Canadian pediatric nephrologists' perceptions regarding dialysis initiation in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and (2) determine the factors guiding practice that may contribute to practice variation across Canada.

Design: This study was a cross-sectional online survey.

Setting: This study was done in academic pediatric nephrology centers in Canada.

Participants: The participants of this study are pediatric nephrologists.

Measurements And Methods: An anonymous web-based survey was administered to pediatric nephrologists in Canada to evaluate perspectives and practice patterns regarding timing of dialysis initiation. We also explored the importance of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) vs. symptoms and the role of patient and provider factors influencing decisions.

Results: Thirty-five nephrologists (59 %) completed the survey. Most respondents care for advanced CKD patients in a multidisciplinary clinic (86 %) and no centers have a formal policy on timing of dialysis initiation. Seventy-five percent of centers follow <20 stage 4-5 CKD patients, and 9 % follow >30 patients. Discussions about dialysis initiation are generally informal (75 %) and the decision to start is made by the nephrologist (37 %) or a team (57 %). Fifty percent agreed GFR was important when deciding when to initiate dialysis, 41 % were neutral, and 9 % disagreed. Variability exists in the threshold that nephrologists considered early (vs. late) dialysis initiation: >20 (21 %), >15 (38 %), >12 (26 %), and >10 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (12 %). Practitioners however typically start dialysis in asymptomatic patients at eGFRs of 7-9 (9 %), 10-11 (41 %), 12-14 (38 %), and 15-19 (6 %) ml/min/1.73 m(2). Patient factors important in the decision to start dialysis for >90 % of nephrologists were fatigue, >10 % weight loss, nausea, increasing missed school, and awaiting a pre-emptive transplant. Age was only a factor for 56 %.

Limitations: This study has a 59 % response rate.

Conclusions: Variability exists in Canada regarding the importance and threshold of eGFR guiding the decision as to when to start dialysis in children, whereas patient symptoms are almost universally important to pediatric nephrologists' decision-making. Additional studies evaluating outcomes of children starting dialysis earlier vs. later are needed to standardize decision-making and care for children with kidney failure.

Citing Articles

Validation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Pediatric CKD (PRO-Kid).

Matsuda-Abedini M, Zappitelli M, Widger K, Rapoport A, Dionne J, Chanchlani R Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024; 19(7):851-859.

PMID: 38861473 PMC: 11254021. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000467.


Caregiver perspectives of dialysis initiation for children with kidney disease: a qualitative study.

House T, Rosenberg A, Zimmerman C, Barton K, Wightman A Pediatr Nephrol. 2022; 37(10):2457-2469.

PMID: 35181825 PMC: 10433404. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-022-05472-x.


Factors influencing the timing of initiation of renal replacement therapy and choice of modality in children with end-stage kidney disease.

Favel K, Dionne J Pediatr Nephrol. 2019; 35(1):145-151.

PMID: 31654222 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-019-04391-8.


Higher eGFR at Dialysis Initiation Is Not Associated with a Survival Benefit in Children.

Winnicki E, Johansen K, Cabana M, Warady B, McCulloch C, Grimes B J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019; 30(8):1505-1513.

PMID: 31320460 PMC: 6683704. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2018111130.


Associations Between Weight Loss, Kidney Function Decline, and Risk of ESRD in the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) Cohort Study.

Ku E, Kopple J, McCulloch C, Warady B, Furth S, Mak R Am J Kidney Dis. 2017; 71(5):648-656.

PMID: 29132947 PMC: 5916028. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.08.013.


References
1.
Rosansky S, Clark W, Eggers P, Glassock R . Initiation of dialysis at higher GFRs: is the apparent rising tide of early dialysis harmful or helpful?. Kidney Int. 2009; 76(3):257-61. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2009.161. View

2.
Mann B, Manns B, Dart A, Kappel J, Molzahn A, Naimark D . An assessment of dialysis provider's attitudes towards timing of dialysis initiation in Canada. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2015; 1:3. PMC: 4346295. DOI: 10.1186/2054-3581-1-3. View

3.
. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002; 39(2 Suppl 1):S1-266. View

4.
Evans M, Tettamanti G, Nyren O, Bellocco R, Fored C, Elinder C . No survival benefit from early-start dialysis in a population-based, inception cohort study of Swedish patients with chronic kidney disease. J Intern Med. 2010; 269(3):289-98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02280.x. View

5.
Seikaly M, Salhab N, Browne R . Patterns and time of initiation of dialysis in US children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2005; 20(7):982-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-004-1803-7. View