» Articles » PMID: 27375661

Drought Stress Predominantly Endures Arabidopsis Thaliana to Pseudomonas Syringae Infection

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2016 Jul 5
PMID 27375661
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Plant responses to a combination of drought and bacterial pathogen infection, an agronomically important and altogether a new stress, are not well-studied. While occurring concurrently, these two stresses can lead to synergistic or antagonistic effects on plants due to stress-interaction. It is reported that plant responses to the stress combinations consist of both strategies, unique to combined stress and those shared between combined and individual stresses. However, the combined stress response mechanisms governing stress interaction and net impact are largely unknown. In order to study these adaptive strategies, an accurate and convenient methodology is lacking even in model plants like Arabidopsis thaliana. The gradual nature of drought stress imposition protocol poses a hindrance in simultaneously applying pathogen infection under laboratory conditions to achieve combined stress. In present study we aimed to establish systematic combined stress protocol and to study physiological responses of the plants to various degrees of combined stress. Here, we have comprehensively studied the impact of combined drought and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 infection on A. thaliana. Further, by employing different permutations of drought and pathogen stress intensities, an attempt was made to dissect the contribution of each individual stress effects during their concurrence. We hereby present two main aspects of combined stress viz., stress interaction and net impact of the stress on plants. Mainly, this study established a systematic protocol to assess the impact of combined drought and bacterial pathogen stress. It was observed that as a result of net impact, some physiological responses under combined stress are tailored when compared to the plants exposed to individual stresses. We also infer that plant responses under combined stress in this study are predominantly influenced by the drought stress. Our results show that pathogen multiplication was reduced by drought stress in combined stressed plants. Combined stressed plants also displayed reduced ROS generation and declined cell death which could be attributed to activation of effective basal defense responses. We hypothesize a model on ABA mediated gene regulation to partly explain the possible mechanistic basis for reduced in planta bacterial numbers under combined stress over individual pathogen stress.

Citing Articles

Impact of Nutrient Stress on Plant Disease Resistance.

Martin-Cardoso H, San Segundo B Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).

PMID: 40004243 PMC: 11855198. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041780.


Nitric Oxide Mitigates the Deleterious Effects Caused by Infection of pv. and Modulates the Carbon Assimilation Process in Sweet Cherry under Water Stress.

Rubilar-Hernandez C, Alvarez-Maldini C, Pizarro L, Figueroa F, Villalobos-Gonzalez L, Pimentel P Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 38794433 PMC: 11125257. DOI: 10.3390/plants13101361.


Insights into Reactive Oxygen Species Production-Scavenging System Involved in Sugarcane Response to Infection under Drought Stress.

Wei Y, Zhao J, Javed T, Ali A, Huang M, Fu H Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38592879 PMC: 10974620. DOI: 10.3390/plants13060862.


Soil Microbes and Plant-Associated Microbes in Response to Radioactive Pollution May Indirectly Affect Plants and Insect Herbivores: Evidence for Indirect Field Effects from Chernobyl and Fukushima.

Sakauchi K, Otaki J Microorganisms. 2024; 12(2).

PMID: 38399767 PMC: 10892324. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12020364.


Effect of and drought on seedlings.

Masera P, Pildain M, Aquino M, De Errasti A, Dalla Salda G, Rajchenberg M AoB Plants. 2023; 15(5):plad068.

PMID: 37899976 PMC: 10601059. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plad068.


References
1.
Beattie G . Water relations in the interaction of foliar bacterial pathogens with plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2011; 49:533-55. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114436. View

2.
Lim C, Baek W, Jung J, Kim J, Lee S . Function of ABA in Stomatal Defense against Biotic and Drought Stresses. Int J Mol Sci. 2015; 16(7):15251-70. PMC: 4519898. DOI: 10.3390/ijms160715251. View

3.
Delessert C, Kazan K, Wilson I, Van Der Straeten D, Manners J, Dennis E . The transcription factor ATAF2 represses the expression of pathogenesis-related genes in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2005; 43(5):745-57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02488.x. View

4.
Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth B, Remm M . Primer3--new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40(15):e115. PMC: 3424584. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks596. View

5.
Yang S, Seo P, Yoon H, Park C . The Arabidopsis NAC transcription factor VNI2 integrates abscisic acid signals into leaf senescence via the COR/RD genes. Plant Cell. 2011; 23(6):2155-68. PMC: 3160032. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.111.084913. View