» Articles » PMID: 27375620

Molecular Mechanisms for CAMP-Mediated Immunoregulation in T Cells - Role of Anchored Protein Kinase A Signaling Units

Overview
Journal Front Immunol
Date 2016 Jul 5
PMID 27375620
Citations 90
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The cyclic AMP/protein kinase A (cAMP/PKA) pathway is one of the most common and versatile signal pathways in eukaryotic cells. A-kinase anchoring proteins (AKAPs) target PKA to specific substrates and distinct subcellular compartments providing spatial and temporal specificity for mediation of biological effects channeled through the cAMP/PKA pathway. In the immune system, cAMP is a potent negative regulator of T cell receptor-mediated activation of effector T cells (Teff) acting through a proximal PKA/Csk/Lck pathway anchored via a scaffold consisting of the AKAP Ezrin holding PKA, the linker protein EBP50, and the anchoring protein phosphoprotein associated with glycosphingolipid-enriched microdomains holding Csk. As PKA activates Csk and Csk inhibits Lck, this pathway in response to cAMP shuts down proximal T cell activation. This immunomodulating pathway in Teff mediates clinically important responses to regulatory T cell (Treg) suppression and inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandins (PGs), adrenergic stimuli, adenosine, and a number of other ligands. A major inducer of T cell cAMP levels is PG E2 (PGE2) acting through EP2 and EP4 prostanoid receptors. PGE2 plays a crucial role in the normal physiological control of immune homeostasis as well as in inflammation and cancer immune evasion. Peripherally induced Tregs express cyclooxygenase-2, secrete PGE2, and elicit the immunosuppressive cAMP pathway in Teff as one tumor immune evasion mechanism. Moreover, a cAMP increase can also be induced by indirect mechanisms, such as intercellular transfer between T cells. Indeed, Treg, known to have elevated levels of intracellular cAMP, may mediate their suppressive function by transferring cAMP to Teff through gap junctions, which we speculate could also be regulated by PKA/AKAP complexes. In this review, we present an updated overview on the influence of cAMP-mediated immunoregulatory mechanisms acting through localized cAMP signaling and the therapeutical increasing prospects of AKAPs disruptors in T-cell immune function.

Citing Articles

GPR132 regulates the function of NK cells through the Gαs/CSK/ZAP70/NF-κB signaling pathway as a potential immune checkpoint.

Hui X, Xue M, Ren Y, Chen Y, Chen X, Farooq M Sci Adv. 2025; 11(10):eadr9395.

PMID: 40043109 PMC: 11881902. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adr9395.


Exploring the interaction between the gut microbiota and cyclic adenosine monophosphate-protein kinase A signaling pathway: a potential therapeutic approach for neurodegenerative diseases.

Deng F, Yang D, Qing L, Chen Y, Zou J, Jia M Neural Regen Res. 2024; 20(11):3095-3112.

PMID: 39589173 PMC: 11881707. DOI: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00607.


and pharmacological evaluation of GPR65 as a cancer immunotherapy target regulating T-cell functions.

Li S, Melchiore F, Kantari-Mimoun C, Mouton A, Knockaert S, Philippon W Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1483258.

PMID: 39483470 PMC: 11525786. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1483258.


Neuropeptide signalling orchestrates T cell differentiation.

Hou Y, Sun L, LaFleur M, Huang L, Lambden C, Thakore P Nature. 2024; 635(8038):444-452.

PMID: 39415015 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08049-w.


Germline mutations in a G protein identify signaling cross-talk in T cells.

Ham H, Jing H, Lamborn I, Kober M, Koval A, Berchiche Y Science. 2024; 385(6715):eadd8947.

PMID: 39298586 PMC: 11811912. DOI: 10.1126/science.add8947.


References
1.
Egerton M, Burgess W, Chen D, Druker B, BRETSCHER A, Samelson L . Identification of ezrin as an 81-kDa tyrosine-phosphorylated protein in T cells. J Immunol. 1992; 149(6):1847-52. View

2.
Kawabuchi M, Satomi Y, Takao T, Shimonishi Y, Nada S, Nagai K . Transmembrane phosphoprotein Cbp regulates the activities of Src-family tyrosine kinases. Nature. 2000; 404(6781):999-1003. DOI: 10.1038/35010121. View

3.
Houslay M, Milligan G . Tailoring cAMP-signalling responses through isoform multiplicity. Trends Biochem Sci. 1997; 22(6):217-24. DOI: 10.1016/s0968-0004(97)01050-5. View

4.
Henney C, Lichtenstein L . The role of cyclic AMP in the cytolytic activity of lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1971; 107(2):610-2. View

5.
Gupta R, DuBois R . Colorectal cancer prevention and treatment by inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002; 1(1):11-21. DOI: 10.1038/35094017. View