» Articles » PMID: 27367971

Parallax Error in Long-axial Field-of-view PET Scanners-a Simulation Study

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2016 Jul 2
PMID 27367971
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is a growing interest in the design and construction of a PET scanner with a very long axial extent. One critical design challenge is the impact of the long axial extent on the scanner spatial resolution properties. In this work, we characterize the effect of parallax error in PET system designs having an axial field-of-view (FOV) of 198 cm (total-body PET scanner) using fully-3D Monte Carlo simulations. Two different scintillation materials were studied: LSO and LaBr. The crystal size in both cases was 4  ×  4  ×  20 mm. Several different depth-of-interaction (DOI) encoding techniques were investigated to characterize the improvement in spatial resolution when using a DOI capable detector. To measure spatial resolution we simulated point sources in a warm background in the center of the imaging FOV, where the effects of axial parallax are largest, and at several positions radially offset from the center. Using a line-of-response based ordered-subset expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm we found that the axial resolution in an LSO scanner degrades from 4.8 mm to 5.7 mm (full width at half max) at the center of the imaging FOV when extending the axial acceptance angle (α) from  ±12° (corresponding to an axial FOV of 18 cm) to the maximum of  ±67°-a similar result was obtained with LaBr, in which the axial resolution degraded from 5.3 mm to 6.1 mm. For comparison we also measured the degradation due to radial parallax error in the transverse imaging FOV; the transverse resolution, averaging radial and tangential directions, of an LSO scanner was degraded from 4.9 mm to 7.7 mm, for a measurement at the center of the scanner compared to a measurement with a radial offset of 23 cm. Simulations of a DOI detector design improved the spatial resolution in all dimensions. The axial resolution in the LSO-based scanner, with α  =  ± 67°, was improved from 5.7 mm to 5.0 mm by incorporating a two-layer DOI detector. These results characterize the maximum axial blurring for a fully open 2 m long PET scanner and demonstrate that large sensitivity gains are possible with a modest reduction in resolution when using current clinical detector technology with no DOI capability.

Citing Articles

3D in-system calibration method for PET detectors.

Kuhl Y, Mueller F, Thull J, Naunheim S, Schug D, Schulz V Med Phys. 2024; 52(1):232-245.

PMID: 39504412 PMC: 11699997. DOI: 10.1002/mp.17475.


Timing, Energy, and Spatial Characterization of Highly Sampled Monolithic PET Detectors with Different Thicknesses.

Valladares C, Barrio J, Freire M, Cucarella N, Lamprou E, Miyaoka R IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2024; 7(7):704-711.

PMID: 38524735 PMC: 10957137. DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2023.3280711.


A simulation study of the system characteristics for a long axial FOV PET design based on monolithic BGO flat panels compared with a pixelated LSO cylindrical design.

Dadgar M, Maebe J, Abi Akl M, Vervenne B, Vandenberghe S EJNMMI Phys. 2023; 10(1):75.

PMID: 38036794 PMC: 10689648. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-023-00593-0.


Monte Carlo simulation of the system performance of a long axial field-of-view PET based on monolithic LYSO detectors.

Abi-Akl M, Dadgar M, Toufique Y, Bouhali O, Vandenberghe S EJNMMI Phys. 2023; 10(1):37.

PMID: 37311926 PMC: 10264335. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-023-00559-2.


Characterization of the partial volume effect along the axial field-of-view of the Biograph Vision Quadra total-body PET/CT system for multiple isotopes.

Mannheim J, Rausch I, Conti M, Fougere C, Schmidt F EJNMMI Phys. 2023; 10(1):33.

PMID: 37243869 PMC: 10224893. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-023-00554-7.


References
1.
Poon J, Dahlbom M, Moses W, Balakrishnan K, Wang W, Cherry S . Optimal whole-body PET scanner configurations for different volumes of LSO scintillator: a simulation study. Phys Med Biol. 2012; 57(13):4077-94. PMC: 3786676. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/13/4077. View

2.
Price P, Badawi R, Cherry S, Jones T . Ultra staging to unmask the prescribing of adjuvant therapy in cancer patients: the future opportunity to image micrometastases using total-body 18F-FDG PET scanning. J Nucl Med. 2014; 55(4):696-7. PMC: 4128624. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.133892. View

3.
Zhang X, Stortz G, Sossi V, Thompson C, Retiere F, Kozlowski P . Development and evaluation of a LOR-based image reconstruction with 3D system response modeling for a PET insert with dual-layer offset crystal design. Phys Med Biol. 2013; 58(23):8379-99. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/23/8379. View

4.
Yeom J, Vinke R, Levin C . Side readout of long scintillation crystal elements with digital SiPM for TOF-DOI PET. Med Phys. 2014; 41(12):122501. PMC: 4247369. DOI: 10.1118/1.4901524. View

5.
Surti S, Karp J . Impact of detector design on imaging performance of a long axial field-of-view, whole-body PET scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2015; 60(13):5343-58. PMC: 4495586. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/13/5343. View