» Articles » PMID: 27365909

Review of Esophageal Injuries and Stenosis: Lessons Learn and Current Concepts of Management

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2016 Jul 2
PMID 27365909
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To review the patients with esophageal injuries and stenosis with respect to their etiology, clinical course, management, and the lessons learnt from these.

Materials And Methods: Retrospective descriptive observation review of children with esophageal injuries and stenosis admitted between January 2009 and April 2015.

Results: Eighteen children with esophageal injuries of varied etiology were managed and included, seven with corrosive injury, five with perforation due to various causes, three with mucosal erosion, two with trachea esophageal fistula (TEF), and one wall erosion. The five children who had perforation were due to poststricture dilatation in a child with esophageal atresia and secondary to foreign body impaction or its attempted retrieval in four. Alkaline button cell had caused TEF in two. Three congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) had presented with dysphagia and respiratory tract infection. Six corrosive stricture and two CES responded to dilatation alone and one each of them required surgery. Four of the children with esophageal perforation were detected early and required drainage procedure (1), diversion (1), and medical management (2). Pseudo diverticulum was managed expectantly. Among TEF, one had spontaneous closure and other one was lost to follow-up. All the remaining nineteen children have recovered well except one CES had mortality.

Conclusion: Esophageal injuries though rare can be potentially devastating and life-threatening.

Citing Articles

Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy by Pediatric Surgeons: Our Early Experience.

Sayeed A, Alladi A, Lakshmaiah V J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2024; 29(3):251-255.

PMID: 38912033 PMC: 11192260. DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_246_23.


Sequelae of Corrosive Injury in Children: An Observational Study.

Radhakrishna V, Kumar N, Gadgade B, Vasudev R, Alladi A J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2022; 27(4):435-440.

PMID: 36238332 PMC: 9552654. DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_133_21.


Robotic substernal esophageal bypass and reconstruction with gastric conduit-frequently overlooked minimally invasive option.

Petrov R, Bakhos C, Abbas A J Vis Surg. 2019; 5.

PMID: 31157161 PMC: 6538941. DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2019.04.02.


Use of the blue cotton screen method with endoscopy to detect occult esophageal foreign bodies.

Xia Y, Zhang F, Xu H, Xu W Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018; 12(4):428-436.

PMID: 29362659 PMC: 5776492. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.72326.


Long Standing Esophageal Perforation due to Foreign Body Impaction in Children: A Therapeutic Challenge in a Resource Limited Setting.

Bernadette N, Ze J, Pondy A, Kalla C, Kamgaing N, Eone D Case Rep Pediatr. 2017; 2017:9208474.

PMID: 28929005 PMC: 5591923. DOI: 10.1155/2017/9208474.


References
1.
Rodriguez Guerineau L, Martinez Sanchez L, Quintilla Martinez J, Trenchs Sainz de la Maza V, Vila Miravet V, Luaces Cubells C . [Caustic ingestion: current situation and review of updated recommendations]. An Pediatr (Barc). 2011; 75(5):334-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2011.03.024. View

2.
Chinski A, Foltran F, Gregori D, Ballali S, Passali D, Bellussi L . Foreign Bodies in the Oesophagus: The Experience of the Buenos Aires Paediatric ORL Clinic. Int J Pediatr. 2010; 2010. PMC: 2945666. DOI: 10.1155/2010/490691. View

3.
Vieira E, Cabral M, Goncalves M . [Esophageal perforation in children: a review of one pediatric surgery institution's experience (16 years)]. Acta Med Port. 2013; 26(2):102-6. View

4.
Shehata S, Enaba M . Endoscopic dilatation for benign oesophageal strictures in infants and toddlers: experience of an expectant protocol from North African tertiary centre. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2012; 9(3):187-92. DOI: 10.4103/0189-6725.104717. View

5.
Saleem M . Acquired oesophageal strictures in children: emphasis on the use of string-guided dilatations. Singapore Med J. 2009; 50(1):82-6. View