Comparison of Chronic Angioscopic Findings of Bare Metal Stents, 1st-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents and 2nd-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents - Multicenter Study of Intra-Coronary Angioscopy After Stent (MICASA)
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: No previous study has reported a comprehensive comparison of the chronic angioscopic findings after bare metal stent (BMS), and 1st- and 2nd-generation drug-eluting stents (DES).
Methods and results: The Multicenter Study on Intra-Coronary Angioscopy after Stent (MICASA) is a multicenter registry of coronary angioscopy. A total of 264 stents were observed by coronary angioscopy 1 year after PCI. There were 15 BMS, 90 1st-generation DES, and 159 2nd-generation DES. Neointimal coverage (NC) of the stent was classified into 4 grades from 0 (no coverage) to 3 (complete coverage). Yellow color (YC) of plaque at the stented segment was graded from 0 (white) to 3 (bright yellow). Minimum (Min-) and Maximum (Max-) NC grade were significantly lower with 1st- and 2nd-generation DES than with BMS. Although the Max-NC grade was similar, the Min-NC grade was significantly higher for 2nd-generation DES than for 1st-generation DES. Both the YC grade and the incidence of thrombus with 2nd-generation DES were lower than with the 1st-generation DES and were comparable to BMS. Multivariate analysis showed that low-density lipoprotein, 1st-generation DES, and acute coronary syndrome were independent factors for yellow plaque (YG2 or 3), and that hypertension and 1st-generation DES were independent factors for the incidence of thrombus.
Conclusions: Coronary angioscopy revealed more homogeneous coverage with white neointima and less thrombus after 2nd-generation DES as compared with 1st-generation DES. These findings may explain the favorable clinical outcomes observed for patients treated with 2nd-generation DES. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1916-1921).
Teragawa H, Orita Y, Oshita C, Uchimura Y Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(9).
PMID: 34573973 PMC: 8472720. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11091632.
Automated interpretation of the coronary angioscopy with deep convolutional neural networks.
Miyoshi T, Higaki A, Kawakami H, Yamaguchi O Open Heart. 2020; 7(1).
PMID: 32404485 PMC: 7228653. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001177.
Suzuki S, Sotomi Y, Kobayashi T, Hamanaka Y, Nakatani S, Shiojima I Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 35(6):973-980.
PMID: 30874980 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-019-01580-2.