» Articles » PMID: 27356877

Management of Refractory Cardiogenic Shock

Overview
Journal Nat Rev Cardiol
Date 2016 Jul 1
PMID 27356877
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening condition that occurs in response to reduced cardiac output in the presence of adequate intravascular volume and results in tissue hypoxia. Cardiogenic shock has several underlying aetiologies, with the most common being acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Refractory cardiogenic shock presents as persistent tissue hypoperfusion despite administration of adequate doses of two vasoactive medications and treatment of the underlying aetiology. Investigators of the SHOCK trial reported a long-term mortality benefit of emergency revascularization for shock complicating AMI. Since the publication of the SHOCK trial and subsequent guideline recommendations, the increase in community-based use of percutaneous coronary intervention for this condition has resulted in a significant decline in mortality. Despite these successes in the past 15 years, mortality still remains exceptionally high, particularly in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. In this Review, we discuss the aetiology and pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock and summarize the data on the available therapeutics and their limitations. Although new mechanical circulatory support devices have been shown to improve haemodynamic variables in patients with shock complicating AMI, they did not improve clinical outcomes and are associated with high costs and complications.

Citing Articles

Early Enteral Nutrition May Improve Survival in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.

Zheng L, Duan J, Duan B Emerg Med Int. 2025; 2025:1465194.

PMID: 39816242 PMC: 11729513. DOI: 10.1155/emmi/1465194.


Impact of awake extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on patients mortality with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and trial sequential meta-analysis based on observational studies.

Yue H, Peng W, Luo K, Zeng J, Ma W, Lu C BMJ Open. 2024; 14(10):e086383.

PMID: 39477257 PMC: 11529589. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086383.


Epigenomic biomarkers insights in PBMCs for prognostic assessment of ECMO-treated cardiogenic shock patients.

Hsiao Y, Chiang S, Wang C, Chi N, Yu H, Hong T Clin Epigenetics. 2024; 16(1):137.

PMID: 39363385 PMC: 11451087. DOI: 10.1186/s13148-024-01751-6.


Efficacy of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with and without intra-aortic balloon pump in adult cardiogenic shock.

Wang H, Li C, Li D, Chen Y, Li W, Liu Y Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1431875.

PMID: 39309601 PMC: 11412878. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1431875.


Stress hyperglycemia is associated with poor prognosis in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock.

Tian J, Zhou T, Liu Z, Dong Y, Xu H Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1446714.

PMID: 39301321 PMC: 11410614. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1446714.


References
1.
Menon V, WEBB J, Hillis L, Sleeper L, Abboud R, Dzavik V . Outcome and profile of ventricular septal rupture with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shocK?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36(3 Suppl A):1110-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00878-0. View

2.
Romeo F, Acconcia M, Sergi D, Romeo A, Muscoli S, Valente S . The outcome of intra-aortic balloon pump support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock according to the type of revascularization: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2013; 165(5):679-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.02.020. View

3.
Zehender M, Kasper W, Kauder E, Schonthaler M, Geibel A, Olschewski M . Right ventricular infarction as an independent predictor of prognosis after acute inferior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328(14):981-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199304083281401. View

4.
Scheidt S, WILNER G, Mueller H, Summers D, Lesch M, Wolff G . Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock. Report of a co-operative clinical trial. N Engl J Med. 1973; 288(19):979-84. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197305102881901. View

5.
Seyfarth M, Sibbing D, Bauer I, Frohlich G, Bott-Flugel L, Byrne R . A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52(19):1584-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.065. View