» Articles » PMID: 27354883

The Role of Computerized Tomography in the Assessment of Perivesical Invasion in Bladder Cancer

Overview
Journal Pol J Radiol
Publisher Termedia
Specialty Radiology
Date 2016 Jun 30
PMID 27354883
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to identify the contrast patterns of a tumor, and to evaluate the possibility of assessing the invasion of the perivesical fatty tissue in bladder cancer.

Material/methods: In this study, 26 patients with bladder cancer were included. Multiphasic CT examination was performed to determine the stage of the disease before radical cystectomy.

Results: There were statistically significant differences in tumor and perivesical fatty tissue densities between pre- and post-contrast phases (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Increases in focal density suspected of being invasion of the perivesical fatty tissue can show perivesical invasion with high specificity.

Citing Articles

The effect of different adipose tissue measurements on clinical prognosis in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy: preliminary results.

Demirci A, Aydin H Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025; .

PMID: 39939543 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-04838-7.


Computed tomography-based nomogram for estimating progression-free survival probability in bladder cancer patients undergoing partial cystectomy.

Cao T, Zhu X, Guo C, Zhang H, Chen L, Zhang T Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025; .

PMID: 39862290 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04747-1.


Differentiation of bladder cancer stages using the vesical imaging -reporting and data system and apparent diffusion coefficient.

Liu W, Chen R, Liu X, Zhou B, Shen Y, Zhou L Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(8):4897-4907.

PMID: 37581052 PMC: 10423393. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-1184.


Can preoperative imaging characteristics predict pT3 bladder cancer following cystectomy?.

Fuletra J, Watts A, Kaag M, Lehman E, Raman J, Merrill S World J Urol. 2020; 39(6):1941-1945.

PMID: 32725305 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03375-w.


The role and effect of FDG-PET/CT on patient management and restaging of bladder carcinoma.

Guney I, Kucuker K, Izol V, Kibar M Turk J Urol. 2019; 45(6):423-430.

PMID: 31603416 PMC: 6788562. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2019.84453.

References
1.
Reuter V . Bladder. Risk and prognostic factors--a pathologist's perspective. Urol Clin North Am. 1999; 26(3):481-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70196-8. View

2.
Husband J, Olliff J, Williams M, Heron C, Cherryman G . Bladder cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging. Radiology. 1989; 173(2):435-40. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.173.2.2798874. View

3.
Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Shariat S, van Rhijn B, Comperat E . EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013. Eur Urol. 2013; 64(4):639-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.003. View

4.
Kim B, Semelka R, Ascher S, Chalpin D, Carroll P, Hricak H . Bladder tumor staging: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced imaging, and late gadolinium-enhanced imaging. Radiology. 1994; 193(1):239-45. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090898. View

5.
Hodson N, Husband J, Macdonald J . The role of computed tomography in the staging of bladder cancer. Clin Radiol. 1979; 30(4):389-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(79)80215-9. View