» Articles » PMID: 27353383

Positive Lymph Node Ratio As an Indicator of Prognosis and Local Tumor Clearance in N3 Gastric Cancer

Abstract

Background: Nodal metastasis is an important clinical issue in gastric cancer patients. This study was designed to investigate the clinical usefulness of the positive lymph node ratio (PLNR), which reflects both metastatic and retrieved lymph node numbers, in patients with pN3 gastric cancer.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 138 consecutive pN3 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy from 2000 to 2012.

Results: A PLNR of 0.4 was proved to be the best cutoff value to stratify the prognosis of patients with pN3 gastric cancer (P < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that older age, larger tumor size (≥10 cm), and PLNR ≥ 0.4 [P < 0.001, HR 3.1 (95 % CI 1.7-5.4)] were independent prognostic factors in pN3 gastric cancer. Regarding the recurrence, patients with PLNR <0.4 had a significantly lower rate of lymph node recurrence than those with PLNR ≥0.4 (P = 0.020). There was no significant difference in the lymph node recurrence rate between N3a and N3b patients in the PLNR <0.4 group [P = 0.546, 11.6 % (7/60) vs. 12.5 (1/8)], indicating a better local control regardless of pN3 subgroups.

Conclusions: PLNR is useful to stratify the prognosis and evaluate the extent of local tumor clearance in pN3 gastric cancer.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of nomograms for predicting the prognosis of early and late recurrence of advanced gastric cancer after radical surgery based on post-recurrence survival.

Liu C, Lu J, An L Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(22):e38376.

PMID: 39259073 PMC: 11142773. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038376.


Machine learning methods predict recurrence of pN3b gastric cancer after radical resection.

Wang H, Shi J, Yang Y, Ma K, Xue Y Transl Cancer Res. 2024; 13(3):1519-1532.

PMID: 38617507 PMC: 11009806. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-1367.


Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in N3 Stage Gastric Cancer After Curative Resection: A Real World Data.

Caliskan Yildirim E, Acikgoz Y, Ergun Y, Algin E, Bal O Cancer Manag Res. 2023; 15:1085-1096.

PMID: 37809035 PMC: 10559796. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S412270.


Evaluation of the prognostic value of negative to positive lymph node ratio in gastric cancer: results from multi-institutional cohorts from western and eastern datasets - Cohort study.

Wang X, Wang P, Wang W, Sun Z, Wang Z, Zhang R Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023; 85(6):2348-2355.

PMID: 37363559 PMC: 10289599. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000775.


Evaluating prognostic value and stage migration effects using a positive lymph node ratio in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Kamiya H, Komatsu S, Nishibeppu K, Ohashi T, Konishi H, Shiozaki A BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):218.

PMID: 36890486 PMC: 9996992. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10689-6.


References
1.
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M . Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2014; 136(5):E359-86. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29210. View

2.
Bonenkamp J, Hermans J, Sasako M, van de Velde C, Welvaart K, Songun I . Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340(12):908-14. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199903253401202. View

3.
Wong J, Rahman S, Saeed N, Lin H, Almhanna K, Shridhar R . Prognostic impact of lymph node retrieval and ratio in gastric cancer: a U.S. single center experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013; 17(12):2059-66. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2380-5. View

4.
Rosenberg R, Friederichs J, Schuster T, Gertler R, Maak M, Becker K . Prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer is associated with lymph node ratio: a single-center analysis of 3,026 patients over a 25-year time period. Ann Surg. 2008; 248(6):968-78. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318190eddc. View

5.
Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, Okamoto K, Ikoma D, Tsujiura M, Shiozaki A . Differences of the lymphatic distribution and surgical outcomes between remnant gastric cancers and primary proximal gastric cancers. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16(3):503-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1804-3. View