» Articles » PMID: 27350369

Physiologic Monitoring of CPR Quality During Adult Cardiac Arrest: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study

Abstract

Aim: The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends monitoring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality using end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) or invasive hemodynamic data. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between clinician-reported physiologic monitoring of CPR quality and patient outcomes.

Methods: Prospective observational study of index adult in-hospital CPR events using the AHA's Get With The Guidelines - Resuscitation Registry. Physiologic monitoring was defined using specific database questions regarding use of either ETCO2 or arterial diastolic blood pressure (DBP) to monitor CPR quality. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between physiologic monitoring and outcomes in a propensity score matched cohort.

Results: In the matched cohort, (monitored n=3032; not monitored n=6064), physiologic monitoring of CPR quality was associated with a higher rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC; OR 1.22, CI95 1.04-1.43, p=0.017) compared to no monitoring. Survival to hospital discharge (OR 1.04, CI95 0.91-1.18, p=0.57) and survival with favorable neurological outcome (OR 0.97, CI95 0.75-1.26, p=0.83) were not different between groups. Of index events with only ETCO2 monitoring indicated (n=803), an ETCO2 >10mmHg during CPR was reported in 520 (65%), and associated with improved survival to hospital discharge (OR 2.41, CI95 1.35-4.30, p=0.003), and survival with favorable neurological outcome (OR 2.31, CI95 1.31-4.09, p=0.004) compared to ETCO2 ≤10mmHg.

Conclusion: Clinician-reported use of either ETCO2 or DBP to monitor CPR quality was associated with improved ROSC. An ETCO2 >10mmHg during CPR was associated with a higher rate of survival compared to events with ETCO2 ≤10mmHg.

Citing Articles

A new method to predict return of spontaneous circulation by peripheral intravenous analysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a rat model pilot study.

Balzer C, Eagle S, Baudenbacher F, Riess M Intensive Care Med Exp. 2024; 12(1):102.

PMID: 39531090 PMC: 11557784. DOI: 10.1186/s40635-024-00679-8.


Physiology-Guided Resuscitation: Monitoring and Augmenting Perfusion during Cardiopulmonary Arrest.

Bernard S, Pashun R, Varma B, Yuriditsky E J Clin Med. 2024; 13(12).

PMID: 38930056 PMC: 11205151. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123527.


Assessing the cost-effectiveness of capnography for end-tidal CO monitoring during in-hospital cardiac arrest: A middle-income country perspective analysis.

da Rosa Decker S, Marzzani L, de Ferreira P, Rosa P, Brauner J, Rosa R Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 40:100373.

PMID: 38510503 PMC: 10946019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100373.


Wolf Creek XVII Part 6: Physiology-Guided CPR.

Bray J, Rea T, Parnia S, Morgan R, Wik L, Sutton R Resusc Plus. 2024; 18:100589.

PMID: 38444864 PMC: 10912729. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100589.


Continuous chest compressions are associated with higher peak inspiratory pressures when compared to 30:2 in an experimental cardiac arrest model.

Malberg J, Marchesi S, Spangler D, Hadziosmanovic N, Smekal D, Rubertsson S Intensive Care Med Exp. 2023; 11(1):75.

PMID: 37938394 PMC: 10632261. DOI: 10.1186/s40635-023-00559-7.


References
1.
Harder V, Stuart E, Anthony J . Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research. Psychol Methods. 2010; 15(3):234-49. PMC: 2936698. DOI: 10.1037/a0019623. View

2.
Cummins R, Chamberlain D, Hazinski M, Nadkarni V, Kloeck W, Kramer E . Recommended guidelines for reviewing, reporting, and conducting research on in-hospital resuscitation: the in-hospital 'Utstein style'. A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association, the European Resuscitation Council,.... Resuscitation. 1997; 34(2):151-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(97)01112-x. View

3.
Sanders A, Kern K, OTTO C, Milander M, Ewy G . End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A prognostic indicator for survival. JAMA. 1989; 262(10):1347-51. View

4.
Chan P, Krumholz H, Nichol G, Nallamothu B . Delayed time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(1):9-17. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706467. View

5.
Levine R, Wayne M, Miller C . End-tidal carbon dioxide and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337(5):301-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199707313370503. View