» Articles » PMID: 27347183

Therapeutic Evaluation of Sorafenib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography: Preliminary Result

Overview
Journal Oncol Lett
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Jun 28
PMID 27347183
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with Sonazoid in evaluating the therapeutic response to sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In total, 26 patients with advanced HCC who received sorafenib and were followed up by CEUS were enrolled in the present study. CEUS was performed prior to and within 2-4 weeks of treatment, and the images of the target lesion in the post-vascular phase with a re-injection method were analyzed. The presence (+) or absence (-) of intratumoral necrosis and the intratumoral vascular architecture on micro-flow imaging (MFI) were compared prior to and subsequent to treatment. Target lesions that exhibited non-enhancement after re-injection were considered to indicate intratumoral necrosis. The intratumoral vascular architecture was classified into three groups, as follows: Vd, the intratumoral vessels visually narrowed or decreased; Vnc, the vessels remained unchanged; and Vi, the vessels were thickened or increased. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test between the intratumoral necrosis (+) and (-) groups, and among the Vd, Vnc and Vi groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. The number of patients in the intratumoral necrosis (+) and (-) groups was 8 and 18 patients, respectively, and the median survival time (MST) was 7.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.2-12.2] and 9.5 months (95% CI, 5.1-13.8), respectively (P=0.44). The MFI findings were observed in 11 patients in the Vd group, 10 patients in the Vnc group and 5 patients in the Vi group. The MSTs in the Vd, Vnc and Vi groups were 15.6 months (95% CI, 5.0-23.3), 11.0 months (95% CI, 3.5-17.6) and 3.6 months (95% CI: 1.2-6.0), respectively. The P-value for the differences between the Vd and Vnc groups, Vd and Vi groups, and Vnc and Vi groups were 0.78, 0.016 and 0.047, respectively, which indicated that the survival time decreased significantly in the Vi group. Evaluation of intratumoral vascular architecture using MFI demonstrates promise for assessing the therapeutic response to sorafenib in patients with HCC.

Citing Articles

Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Sonazoid Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography: 2023 Guidelines From the Korean Society of Radiology and the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Jeong W, Kang H, Choi S, Park M, Yu M, Kim B Korean J Radiol. 2023; 24(6):482-497.

PMID: 37271203 PMC: 10248355. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2023.0324.


Evaluation of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Uchikawa S, Kawaoka T, Fujino H, Ono A, Nakahara T, Murakami E J Med Ultrason (2001). 2022; 50(1):57-62.

PMID: 36169740 PMC: 10912139. DOI: 10.1007/s10396-022-01260-0.


Evaluating the therapeutic effect of lenvatinib against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma by measuring blood flow changes using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Kamachi N, Nakano M, Okamura S, Niizeki T, Iwamoto H, Shimose S Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021; 5(2):e1471.

PMID: 34105904 PMC: 8842703. DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1471.


The AFSUMB Consensus Statements and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound using Sonazoid.

Lee J, Minami Y, Choi B, Lee W, Chou Y, Jeong W J Med Ultrasound. 2020; 28(2):59-82.

PMID: 32874864 PMC: 7446696. DOI: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_124_19.


The AFSUMB Consensus Statements and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound using Sonazoid.

Lee J, Minami Y, Choi B, Lee W, Chou Y, Jeong W Ultrasonography. 2020; 39(3):191-220.

PMID: 32447876 PMC: 7315291. DOI: 10.14366/usg.20057.


References
1.
Hotte S, Hirte H . BAY 43-9006: early clinical data in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Curr Pharm Des. 2002; 8(25):2249-53. DOI: 10.2174/1381612023393053. View

2.
Wilhelm S, Carter C, Tang L, Wilkie D, McNabola A, Rong H . BAY 43-9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2004; 64(19):7099-109. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1443. View

3.
Bruix J, Sala M, Llovet J . Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2004; 127(5 Suppl 1):S179-88. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.032. View

4.
Jain R . Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science. 2005; 307(5706):58-62. DOI: 10.1126/science.1104819. View

5.
Parkin D, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P . Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005; 55(2):74-108. DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74. View