» Articles » PMID: 27344644

Predicting Delayed Union in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures with Consecutive Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Acute Phase: a Multicenter Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2016 Jun 27
PMID 27344644
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of the present study is to determine predictive radiological findings for delayed union by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and plain X-rays at two time points in the acute phase of OVFs.

Methods: This multicenter cohort study was performed from 2012 to 2015. A total of 218 consecutive patients with OVFs ≤2 weeks old were enrolled. MRIs and plain X-rays were performed at the time of enrollment and at 1- and 6-month follow-ups. Signal changes on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) were classified as diffuse low-, confined low-, or no-signal change; those on T2WI were classified as high (similar to the intensity of cerebrospinal fluid), confined low-, diffuse low-, or no-signal change. The angular motion of the fractured vertebral body was measured with X-rays.

Results: A total of 153 patients completed the 6-month follow-up. A high-signal change on T2WI was most useful in predicting delayed union. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were 53.3, 87.8, and 51.6 % at enrollment and 65.5, 84.8, and 51.4 % at the 1-month follow-up, respectively. The positive predictive value increased to 62.5 % with observation of high- or diffuse low-signal changes at both enrollment and the 1-month follow-up. The cutoff value of vertebral motion was 5 degrees. Sensitivity and specificity at enrollment were 52.4 and 74.1 %, respectively.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the radiological factors predicting delayed union after an OVF. T2 high-signal changes showed the strongest association with delayed union. Consecutive MRIs were particularly useful as a differential tool to predict delayed union following OVFs.

Citing Articles

Predictive Factors for Health-Related Quality of Life Post-Balloon Kyphoplasty in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Teraguchi M, Nakagawa Y, Enyo Y, Minetama M, Yamamoto Y, Nakagawa M J Pain Res. 2024; 17:3619-3625.

PMID: 39529945 PMC: 11552407. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S478715.


Exploring factors affecting activities of daily living in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures managed conservatively: a post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study.

Funayama T, Tatsumura M, Fujii K, Shibao Y, Okuwaki S, Sakashita K Asian Spine J. 2024; 18(4):570-578.

PMID: 39117356 PMC: 11366561. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2024.0091.


Mortality, Analgesic Use, and Care Requirements After Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 18,392 Older Adult Patients.

Honda A, Yamana H, Sasabuchi Y, Takasawa E, Mieda T, Tomomatsu Y J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024; 106(16):1453-1460.

PMID: 38950100 PMC: 11594000. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01438.


Comparison of osteoanabolic agents (teriparatide and romosozumab) with bisphosphonates in prevention of subsequent vertebral fractures in patients treated for osteoporotic vertebral fracture for 12 months: An observational cohort study.

Maruo K, Kusukawa T, Toi M, Yamaura T, Hatano M, Oishi H Bone Rep. 2024; 21:101762.

PMID: 38650912 PMC: 11033177. DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2024.101762.


Sagittal Section Hounsfield Units of the Upper Instrumented Vertebrae as a Predictor of Proximal Junctional Vertebral Fractures Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Murata K, Otsuki B, Shimizu T, Sono T, Fujibayashi S, Matsuda S Asian Spine J. 2024; 18(2):209-217.

PMID: 38650092 PMC: 11065512. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2023.0339.


References
1.
Chandra R, Yoo A, Hirsch J . Vertebral augmentation: update on safety, efficacy, cost effectiveness and increased survival?. Pain Physician. 2013; 16(4):309-20. View

2.
Vogler 3rd J, Murphy W . Bone marrow imaging. Radiology. 1988; 168(3):679-93. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.168.3.3043546. View

3.
Zhang J, Yu K . What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998; 280(19):1690-1. DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.19.1690. View

4.
Watts N, Harris S, Genant H . Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Osteoporos Int. 2001; 12(6):429-37. DOI: 10.1007/s001980170086. View

5.
Rao R, Singrakhia M . Painful osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Pathogenesis, evaluation, and roles of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in its management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(10):2010-22. View