Using a Non-Fit Message Helps to De-Intensify Negative Reactions to Tough Advice

Overview

Journal Pers Soc Psychol Bull

Specialty Psychology

Date 2016 Jun 26

PMID 27341845

Citations 7

Authors

Ilona Fridman

Karen A Scherr

Paul A Glare

E Tory Higgins

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Sometimes physicians need to provide patients with potentially upsetting advice. For example, physicians may recommend hospice for a terminally ill patient because it best meets their needs, but the patient and their family dislike this advised option. We explore whether regulatory non-fit could be used to improve these types of situations. Across five studies in which participants imagined receiving upsetting advice from a physician, we demonstrate that regulatory non-fit between the form of the physician's advice (emphasizing gains vs. avoiding losses) and the participants' motivational orientation (promotion vs. prevention) improves participants' evaluation of an initially disliked option. Regulatory non-fit de-intensifies participants' initial attitudes by making them less confident in their initial judgments and motivating them to think more thoroughly about the arguments presented. Furthermore, consistent with previous research on regulatory fit, we showed that the mechanism of regulatory non-fit differs as a function of participants' cognitive involvement in the evaluation of the option.

Citing Articles

Applying Regulatory Focus Theory to Encourage Weight Loss in a Self-directed Intervention.

Fuglestad P, Rothman A, Linde J Int J Behav Med. 2023; 31(2):331-337.

PMID: 37118346 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-023-10180-3.

Feeling Socially Connected and Focusing on Growth: Relationships With Wellbeing During a Major Holiday in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Vaughn L, Burkins P, Chalachan R, Judd J, Garvey C, Luginsland J Front Psychol. 2021; 12:710491.

PMID: 34630218 PMC: 8496488. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710491.

Watchful waiting as a strategy to reduce low-value spinal imaging: study protocol for a randomized trial.

Fenton J, Jerant A, Franks P, Gosdin M, Fridman I, Cipri C Trials. 2021; 22(1):167.

PMID: 33639993 PMC: 7910785. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05106-x.

The Influence of Situational Regulation on the Information Processing of Promotional and Preventive Self-Regulatory Individuals: Evidence From Eye Movements.

Xiong J, Jin X, Li W Front Psychol. 2020; 11:531147.

PMID: 33281654 PMC: 7705097. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531147.

Eye-tracking evidence shows that non-fit messaging impacts attention, attitudes and choice.

Fridman I, Ubel P, Higgins E PLoS One. 2018; 13(10):e0205993.

PMID: 30365559 PMC: 6203368. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205993.

References

Higgins E, Roney C, Crowe E, HYMES C . Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: distinct self-regulatory systems. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994; 66(2):276-86. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.2.276. View

Cesario J, Grant H, Higgins E . Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.". J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004; 86(3):388-404. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.388. View

Ho T, Barbera L, Saskin R, Lu H, Neville B, Earle C . Trends in the aggressiveness of end-of-life cancer care in the universal health care system of Ontario, Canada. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(12):1587-91. PMC: 3082976. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.9897. View

Weeks J, Catalano P, Cronin A, Finkelman M, Mack J, Keating N . Patients' expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(17):1616-25. PMC: 3613151. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1204410. View

Brinol P, Petty R, Barden J . Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: a self-validation analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007; 93(5):711-27. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.711. View

Winter L, Moss M, Hoffman C . Affective forecasting and advance care planning: anticipating quality of life in future health statuses. J Health Psychol. 2009; 14(3):447-56. DOI: 10.1177/1359105309102201. View

Vaughn L, Malik J, Schwartz S, Petkova Z, Trudeau L . Regulatory fit as input for stop rules. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 91(4):601-11. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.601. View

Fridman I, Epstein A, Higgins E . Appropriate Use of Psychology in Patient-Physician Communication: Influencing Wisely. JAMA Oncol. 2015; 1(6):725-6. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0980. View

Zikmund-Fisher B, Fagerlin A, Ubel P . Risky feelings: why a 6% risk of cancer does not always feel like 6%. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 81 Suppl:S87-93. PMC: 2993812. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.041. View

10.

Chen A, Cronin A, Weeks J, Chrischilles E, Malin J, Hayman J . Expectations about the effectiveness of radiation therapy among patients with incurable lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(21):2730-5. PMC: 3709058. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5748. View

11.

Dow L, Matsuyama R, Ramakrishnan V, Kuhn L, Lamont E, Lyckholm L . Paradoxes in advance care planning: the complex relationship of oncology patients, their physicians, and advance medical directives. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 28(2):299-304. PMC: 2815718. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6397. View

12.

Lee A, Aaker J . Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004; 86(2):205-18. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205. View

13.

Quill T, Arnold R, Back A . Discussing treatment preferences with patients who want "everything". Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(5):345-9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00010. View

14.

Koenig A, Cesario J, Molden D, Kosloff S, Higgins E . Incidental experiences of regulatory fit and the processing of persuasive appeals. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009; 35(10):1342-55. DOI: 10.1177/0146167209339076. View

15.

Higgins E . Beyond pleasure and pain. Am Psychol. 1998; 52(12):1280-300. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.12.1280. View

16.

Camacho C, Higgins E, Luger L . Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: what feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 84(3):498-510. View

17.

van den Bergh R, Roemeling S, Roobol M, Aus G, Hugosson J, Rannikko A . Outcomes of men with screen-detected prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance who were managed expectantly. Eur Urol. 2008; 55(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.09.007. View

18.

Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher B, Ubel P . How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey. Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 57(3):294-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.08.007. View

19.

Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling S . Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 6(1):3-5. DOI: 10.1177/1745691610393980. View

20.

Cagle J, Pek J, Clifford M, Guralnik J, Zimmerman S . Correlates of a good death and the impact of hospice involvement: findings from the national survey of households affected by cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2014; 23(3):809-18. PMC: 5484523. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2404-z. View