» Articles » PMID: 27340247

Recruitment Into a Pediatric Continuous Glucose Monitoring RCT

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2016 Jun 25
PMID 27340247
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose was to identify patient/family characteristics and recruitment process characteristics associated with the decision to participate in a 2-year continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) RCT for youth with type 1 diabetes and their families.

Method: Study staff approached patients who were conditionally eligible according to medical record review or referred by a provider. We categorized families according to participation decision (agree vs decline) and timing of decision (day of approach vs later ["thinkers"]).

Results: Over 18 months, we approached 456 eligible patients; 19% agreed on the day of approach, 10% agreed later, 42% declined on the day of approach, and 30% declined later. Agreers were younger ( P = .002), had shorter diabetes duration ( P = .0003), had a lower insulin dose ( P = .02), checked blood glucose levels more often ( P = .002), and were more likely to use pump therapy ( P = .009) than decliners. Patients/families were more likely to agree in fall/winter (41%) than spring/summer (19%, P < .0001). Of decliners, 50% cited no interest in CGM as the reason for nonparticipation. Among thinkers, 49% of patients who made a decision within 2 weeks of being approached agreed; only 15% of thinkers who made a decision >2 weeks after being approached agreed to participate ( P < .0001).

Conclusions: Recruitment is a critical and often challenging phase of clinical trials. Recruitment to pediatric CGM studies may be especially challenging due to youths' reluctance to use CGM. These data provide an opportunity to better understand and possibly optimize recruitment into future pediatric CGM studies and other studies of advanced diabetes technologies.

Citing Articles

Parental Views of Facilitators and Barriers to Research Participation: Systematic Review.

Nathe J, Oskoui T, Weiss E Pediatrics. 2022; 151(1).

PMID: 36477217 PMC: 9808610. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-058067.


Distinct Patterns of Daily Glucose Variability by Pubertal Status in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.

Zhu J, Volkening L, Laffel L Diabetes Care. 2019; 43(1):22-28.

PMID: 31308020 PMC: 6925575. DOI: 10.2337/dc19-0083.


Determination of Pubertal Status in Youths With Type 1 Diabetes Using Height Velocity and Trajectories.

Zhu J, Volkening L, Laffel L J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018; 104(1):74-82.

PMID: 30346541 PMC: 6270965. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2018-01737.


Recruiting a representative sample in adherence research-The MALT multisite prospective cohort study experience.

Shemesh E, Mitchell J, Neighbors K, Feist S, Hawkins A, Brown A Pediatr Transplant. 2017; 21(8).

PMID: 28984072 PMC: 5698095. DOI: 10.1111/petr.13067.

References
1.
Wong J, Foster N, Maahs D, Raghinaru D, Bergenstal R, Ahmann A . Real-time continuous glucose monitoring among participants in the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(10):2702-9. PMC: 4392936. DOI: 10.2337/dc14-0303. View

2.
Snethen J, Broome M, Knafl K, Deatrick J, Angst D . Family patterns of decision-making in pediatric clinical trials. Res Nurs Health. 2006; 29(3):223-32. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20130. View

3.
Pickup J, Ford Holloway M, Samsi K . Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: a qualitative framework analysis of patient narratives. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38(4):544-50. DOI: 10.2337/dc14-1855. View

4.
Caldwell P, Butow P, Craig J . Parents' attitudes to children's participation in randomized controlled trials. J Pediatr. 2003; 142(5):554-9. DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2003.192. View

5.
Miller K, Foster N, Beck R, Bergenstal R, DuBose S, DiMeglio L . Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38(6):971-8. DOI: 10.2337/dc15-0078. View