» Articles » PMID: 27336597

Self-Regulation and Wellbeing When Facing a Blocked Parenthood Goal: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Jun 24
PMID 27336597
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Developmental regulation theories claim that continuing to pursue a goal when it becomes blocked contributes to poorer wellbeing. This consequence is expected to lead to the use of self-regulation strategies in the form of higher disengagement from the goal and higher reengagement in other meaningful goals. The use of these strategies is expected to lead to better wellbeing. A systematic-review and meta-analyses were conducted to test the major predictions of developmental regulation theories for blocked parenthood goal and to investigate possible moderator variables, particularly type and degree of blockage. A total of eight meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Moderation was tested with subgroup analysis. After searching eight databases, 4977 potential relevant manuscripts were identified but only six met inclusion criteria. From the eight meta-analyses conducted, only two were significant. In line with prediction, higher goal blockage was related to higher negative mood and reengagement in other life goals was associated to higher positive mood (p < .001). From a total of eight subgroup analyses performed, results showed that disengaging had a positive impact on wellbeing for people experiencing an unanticipated type of blockage (i.e., infertility) but not for those with an anticipated one (i.e., postponing parenthood; X2 = 4.867, p = .03). From the total of twelve sensitivity analyses performed only one suggested that results might differ. The association between disengagement and mood varied according to study quality. When only average studies were included this association was negative, although non-significant. The evidence obtained did not fully support developmental regulation theories for the pursuit of parenthood goal, but primary research had too many methodological limitations to reach firm conclusions. Future studies aimed at investigating blocked parenthood goal are required to evaluate the value of developmental regulation theories.

Citing Articles

Fertility clinics have a duty of care towards patients who do not have children with treatment.

Gameiro S, Leone D, Mertes H Hum Reprod. 2024; 39(8):1591-1598.

PMID: 38890127 PMC: 11291940. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae128.


Changes, differences, and factors of parenthood in high-risk pregnant women and their partners in Japan.

Kawamura E, Asano M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):205.

PMID: 36964602 PMC: 10037369. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05519-3.


Feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial care for unsuccessful fertility treatment.

Sousa-Leite M, Fernandes M, Reis S, Costa R, Figueiredo B, Gameiro S Health Expect. 2022; 25(6):2902-2913.

PMID: 36128606 PMC: 9700180. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13598.


Quality of life of Sudanese patients attending a fertility clinic: a mixed methods study.

Bayoumi R, Koert E, Boivin J, Viswanath K, McConnell M Health Psychol Behav Med. 2021; 9(1):1006-1030.

PMID: 34881115 PMC: 8648023. DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2021.2007773.


Anxiety, Difficulties, and Coping of Infertile Women.

Iordachescu D, Paica C, Boca A, Gica C, Panaitescu A, Peltecu G Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(4).

PMID: 33920767 PMC: 8071148. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9040466.


References
1.
Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins J, Nygren K . International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22(6):1506-12. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem046. View

2.
Heckhausen J, Wrosch C, FLEESON W . Developmental regulation before and after a developmental deadline: the sample case of "biological clock" for childbearing. Psychol Aging. 2001; 16(3):400-13. DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.16.3.400. View

3.
. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015; 103(3):e18-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.103. View

4.
Fulford B, Bunting L, Tsibulsky I, Boivin J . The role of knowledge and perceived susceptibility in intentions to optimize fertility: findings from the International Fertility Decision-Making Study (IFDMS). Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(12):3253-62. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det373. View

5.
Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson G, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K . The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24(11):2683-7. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep343. View