Relationship Between Adherence to Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet Indices and Incidence of Depression During Up to 8 Years of Follow-up
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between adherence to different Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet indices and the risk of depression.
Design: In a prospective study we assessed 14051 participants of a dynamic (permanently ongoing recruitment) prospective cohort (the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) Project), initially free of depression. At baseline, a validated FFQ was used to assess adherence to four previously proposed DASH indices (Dixon, Mellen, Fung and Günther). To define the outcome we applied two definitions of depression: a less conservative definition including only self-reported physician-diagnosed depression (410 incident cases) and a more conservative definition that required both clinical diagnosis of depression and use of antidepressants (113 incident cases). Cox regression and restricted cubic splines analyses were performed.
Results: After a median follow-up period of 8 years, the multiple-adjusted model showed an inverse association with the Fung DASH score (hazard ratio (HR)=0·76; 95 % CI 0·61, 0·94) when we used the less conservative definition of depression, and also under the more conservative definition (HR=0·63; 95 % CI 0·41, 0·95). We observed a weak inverse association with the Mellen DASH score, but no statistically significant association was found for the other definitions. The restricted cubic splines analyses suggested that these associations were non-linear (U-shaped).
Conclusions: Moderate adherence to the DASH diet as operationalized by Fung and Mellen was related to lower depression risk. Since these associations were non-linear, additional prospective studies are required before the results can be generalized and clinical recommendations can be given.
Diet interventions for depression: Review and recommendations for practice.
Staudacher H, Teasdale S, Cowan C, Opie R, Jacka F, Rocks T Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2024; 59(2):115-127.
PMID: 39628343 PMC: 11783990. DOI: 10.1177/00048674241289010.
Soveid N, Barkhidarian B, Samadi M, Hatami M, Gholami F, Yekaninejad M BMC Microbiol. 2024; 24(1):390.
PMID: 39375584 PMC: 11457455. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-024-03534-8.
Ma L, Yuan J, Yang X, Yan M, Li Y, Niu M J Health Popul Nutr. 2024; 43(1):103.
PMID: 38970091 PMC: 11227153. DOI: 10.1186/s41043-024-00572-w.
Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and incident depression and anxiety.
Lu X, Wu L, Shao L, Fan Y, Pei Y, Lu X Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5599.
PMID: 38961069 PMC: 11222463. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49653-8.
Sochacka K, Kotowska A, Lachowicz-Wisniewska S Nutrients. 2024; 16(7).
PMID: 38613071 PMC: 11013804. DOI: 10.3390/nu16071039.