» Articles » PMID: 27331593

Safety and Acceptability of the PrePex Device When Used in Routine Male Circumcision Service Delivery During Active Surveillance in Zimbabwe

Abstract

Background: Male circumcision devices have the potential to accelerate voluntary medical male circumcision roll-out, with PrePex being one promising device. Here, we present findings on safety and acceptability from active surveillance of the implementation of PrePex among 1000 males circumcised in Zimbabwe.

Methods: The first 1000 men consecutively circumcised using PrePex during routine service delivery were actively followed up. Outcome measures included PrePex uptake, attendance for postcircumcision visits, and adverse events (AEs). A survey was conducted among 500 consecutive active surveillance clients to assess acceptability and satisfaction with PrePex.

Results: A total of 2156 men aged 18 years or older were circumcised across the 6 PrePex active surveillance sites. Of these, 1000 (46.4%) were circumcised using PrePex. Among them, 4 (0.4%) self-removals that required surgery (severe AEs) were observed. Six (0.6%) removals by providers (moderate AEs) did not require surgery. A further 280 (28%) AEs were mild or moderate pain during device removal. There were also 12 (1.2%) moderate AEs unrelated to pain. All AEs resolved without sequelae. There was high adherence to follow-up appointments, with 97.7% of clients attending the scheduled day 7 visit. Acceptability of PrePex was high among survey participants, 93% indicated willingness to recommend the device to peers. Of note, 95.8% of respondents reported experiencing pain when the device was being removed. Additionally, 85.2% reported experiencing odor while wearing the device or during removal.

Conclusions: Active surveillance of the first 1000 men circumcised using PrePex suggests that the device is both safe and acceptable when used in routine service delivery.

Citing Articles

Comment on: Efficacy and safety of two disposable circumcision suture devices for circumcision in adults: a prospective comparative multicenter study.

Tabei S, Raheem O Int J Impot Res. 2024; .

PMID: 38971896 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-024-00947-x.


Is the PrePex device an alternative for surgical male circumcision in adolescents ages 13-17 years? Findings from routine service delivery during active surveillance in Zimbabwe.

Mavhu W, Hatzold K, Madidi N, Maponga B, Dhlamini R, Munjoma M PLoS One. 2019; 14(3):e0213399.

PMID: 30856228 PMC: 6411138. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213399.


PrePex circumcision surveillance: Adverse events and analgesia for device removal.

Lebina L, Milovanovic M, Otwombe K, Abraham P, Manentsa M, Nzenze S PLoS One. 2018; 13(3):e0194271.

PMID: 29579082 PMC: 5868790. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194271.


VMMC Devices-Introducing a New Innovation to a Public Health Intervention.

Ridzon R, Reed J, Sgaier S, Hankins C J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016; 72 Suppl 1:S1-4.

PMID: 27331583 PMC: 4936419. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000967.

References
1.
Mutabazi V, Kaplan S, Rwamasirabo E, Bitega J, Ngeruka M, Savio D . One-arm, open-label, prospective, cohort field study to assess the safety and efficacy of the PrePex device for scale-up of nonsurgical circumcision when performed by nurses in resource-limited settings for HIV prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013; 63(3):315-22. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31828e6412. View

2.
Mutabazi V, Bitega J, Ngeruka L, Hategekimana T, Kaplan S, Karema C . Non-surgical adult male circumcision using the PrePex device: task-shifting from physicians to nurses. Afr J Reprod Health. 2014; 18(1):61-70. View

3.
Bitega J, Ngeruka M, Hategekimana T, Asiimwe A, Binagwaho A . Safety and efficacy of the PrePex device for rapid scale-up of male circumcision for HIV prevention in resource-limited settings. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011; 58(5):e127-34. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182354e65. View

4.
Duffy K, Galukande M, Wooding N, Dea M, Coutinho A . Reach and cost-effectiveness of the PrePex device for safe male circumcision in Uganda. PLoS One. 2013; 8(5):e63134. PMC: 3661578. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063134. View

5.
Kigozi G, Musoke R, Watya S, Kighoma N, Nkale J, Nakafeero M . The safety and acceptance of the PrePex device for non-surgical adult male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda. A non-randomized observational study. PLoS One. 2014; 9(8):e100008. PMC: 4140666. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100008. View