» Articles » PMID: 27330562

The Microbial Community Structure in Industrial Biogas Plants Influences the Degradation Rate of Straw and Cellulose in Batch Tests

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2016 Jun 23
PMID 27330562
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Materials rich in lignocellulose, such as straw, are abundant, cheap and highly interesting for biogas production. However, the complex structure of lignocellulose is difficult for microbial cellulolytic enzymes to access, limiting degradation. The rate of degradation depends on the activity of members of the microbial community, but the knowledge of this community in the biogas process is rather limited. This study, therefore, investigated the degradation rate of cellulose and straw in batch cultivation test initiated with inoculums from four co-digestion biogas plants (CD) and six wastewater treatment plants (WWTP). The results were correlated to the bacterial community by 454-pyrosequencing targeting 16S rRNA gene and by T-RFLP analysis targeting genes of glycoside hydrolase families 5 (cel5) and 48 (cel48), combined with construction of clone libraries.

Results: UniFrac principal coordinate analysis of 16S rRNA gene amplicons revealed a clustering of WWTPs, while the CDs were more separated from each other. Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes dominated the community with a comparably higher abundance of the latter in the processes operating at high ammonia levels. Sequences obtained from the cel5 and cel 48 clone libraries were also mainly related to the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes and here ammonia was a parameter with a strong impact on the cel5 community. The results from the batch cultivation showed similar degradation pattern for eight of the biogas plants, while two characterised by high ammonia level and low bacterial diversity, showed a clear lower degradation rate. Interestingly, two T-RFs from the cel5 community were positively correlated to high degradation rates of both straw and cellulose. One of the respective partial cel5 sequences shared 100 % identity to Clostridium cellulolyticum.

Conclusion: The degradation rate of cellulose and straw varied in the batch tests dependent on the origin of the inoculum and was negatively correlated with the ammonia level. The cellulose-degrading community, targeted by analysis of the glycoside hydrolase families 5 (cel5) and 48 (cel48), showed a dominance of bacteria belonging the Firmicutes and Bacteriodetes, and a positive correlation was found between the cellulose degradation rate of wheat straw with the level of C. cellulolyticum.

Citing Articles

Current status and future developments of assessing microbiome composition and dynamics in anaerobic digestion systems using metagenomic approaches.

Niya B, Yaakoubi K, Beraich F, Arouch M, Meftah Kadmiri I Heliyon. 2024; 10(6):e28221.

PMID: 38560681 PMC: 10979216. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28221.


Energetically exploiting lignocellulose-rich residues in anaerobic digestion technologies: from bioreactors to proteogenomics.

Poulsen J, Macedo W, Bonde T, Nielsen J Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2023; 16(1):183.

PMID: 38017526 PMC: 10685487. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-023-02432-x.


Uncovering Microbiome Adaptations in a Full-Scale Biogas Plant: Insights from MAG-Centric Metagenomics and Metaproteomics.

Hassa J, Tubbesing T, Maus I, Heyer R, Benndorf D, Effenberger M Microorganisms. 2023; 11(10).

PMID: 37894070 PMC: 10608942. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102412.


Microbiome Diversity of Anaerobic Digesters Is Enhanced by Microaeration and Low Frequency Sound.

Loughrin J, Parekh R, Agga G, Silva P, Sistani K Microorganisms. 2023; 11(9).

PMID: 37764193 PMC: 10535533. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11092349.


Co-substrate composition is critical for enrichment of functional key species and for process efficiency during biogas production from cattle manure.

Eliasson K, Singh A, Isaksson S, Schnurer A Microb Biotechnol. 2022; 16(2):350-371.

PMID: 36507711 PMC: 9871532. DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.14194.


References
1.
Riviere D, Desvignes V, Pelletier E, Chaussonnerie S, Guermazi S, Weissenbach J . Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge. ISME J. 2009; 3(6):700-14. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2009.2. View

2.
Kovacs E, Wirth R, Maroti G, Bagi Z, Rakhely G, Kovacs K . Biogas production from protein-rich biomass: fed-batch anaerobic fermentation of casein and of pig blood and associated changes in microbial community composition. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10):e77265. PMC: 3797734. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077265. View

3.
Sun L, Pope P, Eijsink V, Schnurer A . Characterization of microbial community structure during continuous anaerobic digestion of straw and cow manure. Microb Biotechnol. 2015; 8(5):815-27. PMC: 4554469. DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12298. View

4.
Mba Medie F, Davies G, Drancourt M, Henrissat B . Genome analyses highlight the different biological roles of cellulases. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012; 10(3):227-34. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2729. View

5.
Noike T, Endo G, Chang J, Yaguchi J, Matsumoto J . Characteristics of carbohydrate degradation and the rate-limiting step in anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1985; 27(10):1482-9. DOI: 10.1002/bit.260271013. View