» Articles » PMID: 27330309

Sequential Measurements of Serum Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 to Monitor Chemotherapy Responses in Patients with Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Jun 23
PMID 27330309
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) plays an important role in tumor invasion and metastasis, including lung cancer. However, whether variations in serum MMP-9 levels can serve as a biomarker for monitoring chemotherapy curative effect remains unclear. This study was designed to investigate the association between variations in serum MMP-9 levels and chemotherapy curative effect in patients with lung cancer.

Patients And Methods: A total of 82 patients with advanced lung cancer were included. All newly diagnosed patients were treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. Serial measurements of serum MMP-9 levels were performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In this manner, we chose four time points to examine the association, including before chemotherapy, and 3 weeks after the beginning of the first, second, and fourth cycles of chemotherapy.

Results: Compared with the serum level of MMP-9 before progressive disease, patients with progressive disease had elevated serum levels of MMP-9. Compared with the previous time point of collecting specimens, the serum levels of MMP-9 in the patients with a complete response/partial response/stable disease decreased or were maintained stable. The differences of variation in serum MMP-9 levels in patients with different chemotherapy curative effects were all statistically significant after one cycle, two cycles, and four cycles (after one cycle: P<0.001; after two cycles: P<0.001; after four cycles: P=0.01). However, patients with small-cell lung cancer did not exhibit similar test results.

Conclusion: The variation in serum MMP-9 levels in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer during chemotherapy was closely related to chemotherapy curative effect and could be useful to monitor chemotherapy curative effect for a small portion of patients.

Citing Articles

The Combination of CD147 and MMP-9 Serum Levels Is Identified as Novel Chemotherapy Response Markers of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Qiao X, Gu Y, Yu J, Wang J, Liu X, Gu M Dis Markers. 2020; 2020:8085053.

PMID: 32377273 PMC: 7196144. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8085053.


Evaluation of Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Serum Concentration as a Biomarker in Malignant Mesothelioma.

Strbac D, Goricar K, Dolzan V, Kovac V Dis Markers. 2019; 2019:1242964.

PMID: 31191742 PMC: 6525906. DOI: 10.1155/2019/1242964.


Roles of DNA repair enzyme OGG1 in innate immunity and its significance for lung cancer.

Vlahopoulos S, Adamaki M, Khoury N, Zoumpourlis V, Boldogh I Pharmacol Ther. 2018; 194:59-72.

PMID: 30240635 PMC: 6504182. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.09.004.

References
1.
Rao J, Gondi C, Chetty C, Chittivelu S, Joseph P, Lakka S . Inhibition of invasion, angiogenesis, tumor growth, and metastasis by adenovirus-mediated transfer of antisense uPAR and MMP-9 in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005; 4(9):1399-408. PMC: 1343495. DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0082. View

2.
Mehner C, Hockla A, Miller E, Ran S, Radisky D, Radisky E . Tumor cell-produced matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) drives malignant progression and metastasis of basal-like triple negative breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2014; 5(9):2736-49. PMC: 4058041. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.1932. View

3.
Zheng S, Chang Y, Hodges K, Sun Y, Ma X, Xue Y . Expression of KISS1 and MMP-9 in non-small cell lung cancer and their relations to metastasis and survival. Anticancer Res. 2010; 30(3):713-8. View

4.
Deryugina E, Quigley J . Matrix metalloproteinases and tumor metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006; 25(1):9-34. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-006-7886-9. View

5.
Yaghmai V, Miller F, Rezai P, Benson 3rd A, Salem R . Response to treatment series: part 2, tumor response assessment--using new and conventional criteria. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 197(1):18-27. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.6581. View