» Articles » PMID: 27325075

From SARS to Avian Influenza: The Role of International Factors in China's Approach to Infectious Disease Control

Overview
Journal Ann Glob Health
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Date 2016 Jun 22
PMID 27325075
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Over the past decades global environmental change, globalization, urbanization, and the rise in movement of people have increased the risk for pandemic disease outbreaks. As environmental exposures do not respect state borders, a globalist concept of global health response has developed, which requires transparency and cooperation for coordinated responses to disease outbreaks. Countries that avoid cooperation on health issues for social or political reasons can endanger the global community.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the rapid change in China's infectious disease policy between 2000 and 2013, from actively rejecting the assistance of international health experts during the HIV/AIDS and severe acute respiratory syndrome crises to following best-practice disease response policies and cooperating with international health actors during the 2013 avian influenza outbreak.

Methods: Using international relations theory, I examined whether international political factors had a major influence on this change. Using the case studies of international reputation, socialization with international organizations, and the securitization of infectious disease, this study examined the influence of international and domestic pressures on Chinese infectious disease policy.

Findings: Although international relations theory, especially theories popular in global health diplomacy literature, provide valuable insight into the role of international factors and foreign policy interests in China's changing approach to infectious disease control, it cannot provide viable explanations without considering the domestic interests of the Chinese government.

Conclusion: Analysis of state responses to infectious disease using international relations theories must consider domestic political factors.

Citing Articles

HIV/AIDS, SARS, and COVID-19: the trajectory of China's pandemic responses and its changing politics in a contested world.

Zhou Y Global Health. 2024; 20(1):1.

PMID: 38167039 PMC: 10759387. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-023-01011-x.


The Virus, the Dollar, and the Global Order: The COVID-19 Crisis in Comparative Perspective.

Hung H Dev Change. 2022; .

PMID: 36247352 PMC: 9537930. DOI: 10.1111/dech.12735.


The hit of the novel coronavirus outbreak to China's economy.

Duan H, Bao Q, Tian K, Wang S, Yang C, Cai Z China Econ Rev. 2022; 67:101606.

PMID: 35058677 PMC: 7910659. DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101606.


Neglected challenges in the control of animal rabies in China.

Miao F, Li N, Yang J, Chen T, Liu Y, Zhang S One Health. 2021; 12:100212.

PMID: 33553562 PMC: 7843516. DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100212.


Unequal discourses: Problems of the current model of world health development.

Ho J, Li Y, Whitworth K World Dev. 2020; 137:105176.

PMID: 32929297 PMC: 7480991. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105176.


References
1.
Rushton S . AIDS and international security in the United Nations System. Health Policy Plan. 2010; 25(6):495-504. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czq051. View

2.
Elbe S . Haggling over viruses: the downside risks of securitizing infectious disease. Health Policy Plan. 2010; 25(6):476-85. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czq050. View

3.
Fidler D . SARS: political pathology of the first post-Westphalian pathogen. J Law Med Ethics. 2004; 31(4):485-505. PMC: 7166417. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00117.x. View

4.
Davies S . What contribution can international relations make to the evolving global health agenda?. Int Aff. 2010; 86(5):1167-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00934.x. View

5.
Lam W, Zhong N, Tan W . Overview on SARS in Asia and the world. Respirology. 2004; 8 Suppl:S2-5. PMC: 7159403. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00516.x. View