» Articles » PMID: 27304069

Protective Efficacy of Recombinant Turkey Herpes Virus (rHVT-H5) and Inactivated H5N1 Vaccines in Commercial Mulard Ducks Against the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1 Clade 2.2.1 Virus

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Jun 16
PMID 27304069
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In Egypt, ducks kept for commercial purposes constitute the second highest poultry population, at 150 million ducks/year. Hence, ducks play an important role in the introduction and transmission of avian influenza (AI) in the Egyptian poultry population. Attempts to control outbreaks include the use of vaccines, which have varying levels of efficacy and failure. To date, the effects of vaccine efficacy has rarely been determined in ducks. In this study, we evaluated the protective efficacy of a live recombinant vector vaccine based on a turkey Herpes Virus (HVT) expressing the H5 gene from a clade 2.2 H5N1 HPAIV strain (A/Swan/Hungary/499/2006) (rHVT-H5) and a bivalent inactivated H5N1 vaccine prepared from clade 2.2.1 and 2.2.1.1 H5N1 seeds in Mulard ducks. A 0.3ml/dose subcutaneous injection of rHVT-H5 vaccine was administered to one-day-old ducklings (D1) and another 0.5ml/dose subcutaneous injection of the inactivated MEFLUVAC was administered at 7 days (D7). Four separate challenge experiments were conducted at Days 21, 28, 35 and 42, in which all the vaccinated ducks were challenged with 106EID50/duck of H5N1 HPAI virus (A/chicken/Egypt/128s/2012(H5N1) (clade 2.2.1) via intranasal inoculation. Maternal-derived antibody regression and post-vaccination antibody immune responses were monitored weekly. Ducks vaccinated at 21, 28, 35 and 42 days with the rHVT-H5 and MEFLUVAC vaccines were protected against mortality (80%, 80%, 90% and 90%) and (50%, 70%, 80% and 90%) respectively, against challenges with the H5N1 HPAI virus. The amount of viral shedding and shedding rates were lower in the rHVT-H5 vaccine groups than in the MEFLUVAC groups only in the first two challenge experiments. However, the non-vaccinated groups shed significantly more of the virus than the vaccinated groups. Both rHVT-H5 and MEFLUVAC provide early protection, and rHVT-H5 vaccine in particular provides protection against HPAI challenge.

Citing Articles

Multivalent Inactivated Vaccine Protects Chickens from Distinct Clades of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Subtypes H5N1 and H5N8.

Kilany W, Safwat M, Zain El-Abideen M, Hisham I, Moussa Y, Ali A Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40006750 PMC: 11860572. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines13020204.


Efficacy of commercial recombinant HVT vaccines against a North American clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in chickens.

Lee J, Lee C, Suarez D, Lee S, Kim T, Spackman E PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0307100.

PMID: 39012858 PMC: 11251577. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307100.


Efficiency of NHEJ-CRISPR/Cas9 and Cre-LoxP Engineered Recombinant Turkey Herpesvirus Expressing OmpH Protein for Fowl Cholera Prevention in Ducks.

Apinda N, Yao Y, Zhang Y, Muenthaisong A, Sangkakam K, Nambooppha B Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(9).

PMID: 37766174 PMC: 10535566. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11091498.


Growth, carcass parameters, biochemical and oxidative stress indices, and meat traits of duck breeds under different stocking densities.

Nasr M, Alkhedaide A, Radwan M, Hafez A, Hussein M, El Bayomi R Poult Sci. 2022; 101(9):101992.

PMID: 35841644 PMC: 9293631. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101992.


Transgenic Chicks Expressing Interferon-Inducible Transmembrane Protein 1 (IFITM1) Restrict Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Viruses.

Rohaim M, Al-Natour M, Abdelsabour M, El Naggar R, Madbouly Y, Ahmed K Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(16).

PMID: 34445163 PMC: 8395118. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22168456.


References
1.
Spackman E, Senne D, Myers T, Bulaga L, Garber L, Perdue M . Development of a real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay for type A influenza virus and the avian H5 and H7 hemagglutinin subtypes. J Clin Microbiol. 2002; 40(9):3256-60. PMC: 130722. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.9.3256-3260.2002. View

2.
Gilbert M, Chaitaweesub P, Parakamawongsa T, Premashthira S, Tiensin T, Kalpravidh W . Free-grazing ducks and highly pathogenic avian influenza, Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006; 12(2):227-34. PMC: 3373083. DOI: 10.3201/eid1202.050640. View

3.
Dinh P, Long H, Thi Kim Tien N, Hien N, Quynh Mai L, Phong L . Risk factors for human infection with avian influenza A H5N1, Vietnam, 2004. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007; 12(12):1841-7. PMC: 3291373. DOI: 10.3201/eid1212.060829. View

4.
Aly M, Arafa A, Hassan M . Epidemiological findings of outbreaks of disease caused by highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus in poultry in Egypt during 2006. Avian Dis. 2008; 52(2):269-77. DOI: 10.1637/8166-103007-Reg.1. View

5.
Kim J, Seiler P, Forrest H, Khalenkov A, Franks J, Kumar M . Pathogenicity and vaccine efficacy of different clades of Asian H5N1 avian influenza A viruses in domestic ducks. J Virol. 2008; 82(22):11374-82. PMC: 2573247. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01176-08. View