» Articles » PMID: 27302844

Prenatal Testing in Huntington Disease: After the Test, Choices Recommence

Overview
Journal Eur J Hum Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2016 Jun 16
PMID 27302844
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was (1) to determine the impact of prenatal diagnosis (PND) for Huntington disease (HD) on subsequent reproductive choices and family structure; and (2) to assess whether children born after PND were informed of their genetic status. Out of 354 presymptomatic carriers of HD gene mutation, aged 18-45 years, 61 couples requested 101 PNDs. Fifty-four women, 29 female carriers and 25 spouses of male carriers, accepted to be interviewed (0.6-16.3 years after the last PND, median 6.5 years) on their obstetrical history and information given to children born after PND. Women were willing to undergo two or more PNDs with a final success rate of 75%. Reproductive decisions differed depending on the outcome of the first PND. If favourable, 62% couples decided against another pregnancy and 10% chose to have an untested child. If unfavourable, 83% decided for another pregnancy (P<0.01), and the majority (87%) re-entered the PND procedure. In contrast, after a second PND, only 37% asked for a PND and 30% chose to have an untested child. Thirty-three percent had both, tested and untested children. Among children born after PND, 10 years and older, 75% were informed of their genetic status. The decision to prevent transmission of the HD mutation is made anew with each pregnancy. Couples may need more psychological support after PND and pre-counselling sessions should take into account the effect of the outcome of a first PND on subsequent reproductive choices.

Citing Articles

A case-note review of continued pregnancies found to be at a high risk of Huntington's disease: considerations for clinical practice.

Wadrup F, Holden S, MacLeod R, Miedzybrodzka Z, Nemeth A, Owens S Eur J Hum Genet. 2019; 27(8):1215-1224.

PMID: 30890781 PMC: 6777622. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0375-8.

References
1.
Dure L, Quaid K, Beasley T . A pilot assessment of parental practices and attitudes regarding risk disclosure and clinical research involving children in Huntington disease families. Genet Med. 2008; 10(11):811-9. PMC: 3708301. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31818adb01. View

2.
Adam S, Wiggins S, Whyte P, Bloch M, Shokeir M, Soltan H . Five year study of prenatal testing for Huntington's disease: demand, attitudes, and psychological assessment. J Med Genet. 1993; 30(7):549-56. PMC: 1016453. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.30.7.549. View

3.
Simpson S, Zoeteweij M, Nys K, Harper P, Durr A, Jacopini G . Prenatal testing for Huntington's disease: a European collaborative study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002; 10(11):689-93. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200871. View

4.
Tyler A, Harper P . Attitudes of subjects at risk and their relatives towards genetic counselling in Huntington's chorea. J Med Genet. 1983; 20(3):179-88. PMC: 1049042. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.20.3.179. View

5.
Evers-Kiebooms G, Nys K, Harper P, Zoeteweij M, Durr A, Jacopini G . Predictive DNA-testing for Huntington's disease and reproductive decision making: a European collaborative study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002; 10(3):167-76. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200781. View