Which Bisphosphonate? It's the Compliance!: Decision Analysis
Overview
Affiliations
Background: The best options of several bisphosphonates for prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women remain controversial. We determined which bisphosphonate provides better efficacy in prevention of osteoporotic fractures using a decision analysis tool, in terms of quality of life.
Methods: A decision analysis model was constructed containing final outcome score and the probability of vertebral and hip fracture within 1 year. Final outcome was defined as health-related quality of life, and was used as an utility in the decision tree. Probabilities were obtained by literature review, and health-related quality of life was evaluated by consensus committee. A roll back tool was used to determine the best bisphosphonate, and sensitivity analysis was performed to compensate for decision model uncertainty.
Results: The decision model favored bisphosphonate with higher compliance in terms of quality of life. In one-way sensitivity analysis, ibandronate was more beneficial than the others, when probability of compliance on ibandronate was above 0.589.
Conclusions: In terms of quality of life, the decision analysis model showed that compliance was most important for patients in real world, regardless of type of bisphosphonate.
Lee E, Kwon S, Park H J Bone Metab. 2021; 28(3):201-206.
PMID: 34520653 PMC: 8441533. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2021.28.3.201.
Medications for osteoporotic pain.
Shin S Korean J Pain. 2017; 30(2):85.
PMID: 28416990 PMC: 5392660. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2017.30.2.85.
The Efficacy of Bisphosphonates for Prevention of Osteoporotic Fracture: An Update Meta-analysis.
Byun J, Jang S, Lee S, Park S, Yoon H, Yoon B J Bone Metab. 2017; 24(1):37-49.
PMID: 28326300 PMC: 5357611. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2017.24.1.37.
Osteoblasts Are the Centerpiece of the Metastatic Bone Microenvironment.
Jeong H, Cho S, Park S Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2016; 31(4):485-492.
PMID: 28029019 PMC: 5195822. DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2016.31.4.485.